Translate

GPA Store: Featured Products

Showing posts with label TENTH AMENDMENT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TENTH AMENDMENT. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

H.J. Res. 62: Amending The Constitution To End States Rights?


Wiki Commons
Marti Oakley, Contributing Writer
Activist Post 

H.J. Res. 62Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to give states the right to repeal Federal laws and regulations when ratified by the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States. 

Sounds like a great deal . . . right?  Wrong!  The states already have the right to repeal Federal laws and regulations.  It is called nullification under the 10th Amendment. 

Or, states can refuse to contract with the Federal government or any of its privately owned corporate agencies, thereby refusing the contract and any of its provisions (regulations or laws).

Secondary to this action, is the refusal to accept any Federal funding offered to implement what is usually a series of laws or regulations, (these being written by unelected bureaucrats, lobbyists and other interested stakeholders), meant to deprive you of your rights, intrude on your privacy, interfere with your right to engage in business and otherwise reduce and abrogate your constitutionally protected freedoms.

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Maine town becomes first to declare food sovereignty



Ethan A. Huff
Natural News

The town of Sedgwick, Maine, currently leads the pack as far as food sovereignty is concerned. Local residents recently voted unanimously at a town hall meeting to pass an ordinance that reinforces its citizens' God-given rights to "produce, process, sell, purchase, and consume local foods of their choosing," which includes even state- and federally-restricted foods like raw milk.

The declaration is one of the first of its kind to be passed in the US, and it is definitely not the last. Several other Maine towns -- including Penobscott, Brooksville, and Blue Hill -- all have similar ordinances up for vote in the coming weeks.


"Tears of joy welled in my eyes as my town voted to adopt this ordinance," said Mia Strong, a Sedgwick resident who frequents local farms. "I am so proud of my community. They made a stand for local food and our fundamental rights as citizens to choose that food."

In addition to simply declaring food sovereignty, the ordinance also declares it a crime for state and federal authorities to violate ordinance provisions in any way. The law specifically states that "[i]t shall be unlawful for any law or regulation adopted by the state or federal government to interfere with the rights recognized by this Ordinance." This includes, of course, any attempt to enforce the unconstitutional provisions of the S 510 the HR 2751 food tyranny bills that were recently passed (http://www.naturalnews.com/030789_Food_Safety_small_farmers.html).

And what about potential conflicts that may arise between farmer and patron? The two will agree to enter into private agreements with one another, apart from government interference, and settle any disputes that arise personally and civilly. It is the way things used to be done before Americans sacrificed their freedoms to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other federal agencies that now tell the public what they can and cannot eat.

In December, the state of Vermont drafted its own food sovereignty bill (http://www.naturalnews.com/030827_food_sovereignty_Vermont.html), and several others are considering similar bills as well.

To learn more about how to promote food sovereignty in your town, city, county, or state, visit the Tenth Amendment Center at: http://www.naturalnews.com/030827_food_sovereignty_Vermont.html

Sources for this story include:
http://www.thecompletepatient.com/journal/2011/3/7/heres-a-way-to-eliminate-the-regulators-and-lawyers-and-buil.html



Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

New Rules: You And The IRS This Januar

Dees Illustration
David Nguyen
Activist Post

The new ObamaCare1099 rule for reporting of all cash, credit and check business transactions of $600 or more is scheduled to begin January of 2012.  This is really an extension of the 2008 Housing and Recovery Act IRS rules that start this January when merchant banks and PayPal will report business sales directly to the IRS (the reporting threshold is $20,000 and 200 transactions a year).

These new IRS rules will affect every American:

• Income tax collection could rise as much as $345 billion a year
• Small businesses will be crushed and unemployment will rise
• A cashless economy is further set in motion
• IRS snooping and audits will increase
• Gold can be tracked
• Identity theft is a risk
• Government surveillance will increase

THE TAX GAP

ObamaCare requires that businesses and self-employed individuals submit 1099 forms to the IRS for all business purchases of $600 or more.  The stated purpose for this is to close the 'tax gap' which is the difference between the amount of what is "owed" and what is paid, due to lack of reporting and under-reporting, and is estimated at $300 billion dollars a year.  Last week, the Senate failed to repeal the ObamaCare 1099 rule because they could not agree on how to make up the "lost" revenue that would be generated from strict reporting, which they estimated to be $19 billion over 10 years, which is a GROSS underestimate.


document from the Senate Committee on Finance in 2009 states that the intention is to close the tax gap (estimated at $345 billion here).  If the IRS is 100% successful, they will collect $345 billion a year in extra tax money.

The key issues are under-reporting and non-reporting, so the government's remedy is to require voluminous detailed record keeping and reporting by businesses and private contractors.  They want to monitor how much each business brings in and how much they spend, almost down to the penny (or $600 anyway).

According to the Senate document, the IRS targets businesses with assets under $10 million for the 1099-MISC forms, as they found that only 8% of them file the forms. The IRS expects the so-called "voluntary" income reporting rate to jump from the current 46% to 95%. This means that the IRS aims to collect $345 billion a year by requiring mountains of detailed paperwork from businesses and independent freelancers.  Individual filers are also targeted by the IRS. Traditionally, the IRS 1099-MISC form has been used primarily to report independent contractor income (a service), but it now includes the sales of goods totaling $600 or more in course of business.

The purchaser or buyer is responsible for issuing 1099 forms for all business transactions. However, this rule applies only to business exchanges, so individuals will be spared from collecting 1099 forms from grocery stores, for example, if the purchases are for personal use and outside of business.

The new measure is reported to have been waiting in the wings for the right opportunity and now that it is law, and with so much money on the line, it will be almost impossible to repeal.  Even if it was repealed, the Housing Recovery Act, a companion to ObamaCare tax laws, goes into effect January 2011.

THE HOUSING AND ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT OF 2008 (HR 3221)

Originally, the 2008 Housing Act required merchant banks and third party processors to report volume business sales of $600 or more to the IRS, but PayPal pressured Congress into raising the reporting threshold to 200 credit transactions and payments over $20,000 a year. Any business that uses a merchant bank account or third party network like PayPal with 200 credit transactions and sales of $20,000 or more needs to keep meticulous records because their financial data will be sent directly to the IRS. This begins January 2011.

This new provision will allow the IRS to supervise credit and debit payment streams that were formerly difficult to track.  In the past, the IRS needed a subpoena from a judge to get information from merchant accounts.  Now the IRS can spy on merchant accounts and audit without notice.  Further, the IRS can guesstimate cash sales based on credit sales and compare those to similar businesses. If the IRS deems the cash sales as being too low, it could trigger an IRS inquiry or audit.

Because merchant banks and third party processors will send data directly to the IRS, they will have access to information not only on the sellers, but also the BUYERS!  The volume aggregate sales will be sent directly to the IRS, but records of individual sales will be stored as back up data so the IRS may have access to individual buyer information.

Taxation is a function of government, but now banks and third party processors are part of the equation. Identity theft is a risk for self employed individuals and small businesses that use their Social Security numbers as Tax ID numbers with the new bank tracking system.

OBAMACARE AND THE DEATH OF CASH

Close to 60% of Americans oppose ObamaCare and the new 1099 reporting is a way to offset the cost.  While the IRS contends that this is not a new tax, it can be argued that it is new because of the 1099 reporting now includes of sales of goods.  Even if some States, businesses and individuals reject ObamaCare and want to opt-out, the taxpayer is still stuck paying the bill.

The IRS is the enforcer of ObamaCare. The IRS has the power steal money from bank accounts, garnish wages, put people in jail and some IRS agents carry guns.

ObamaCare reinstates the original $600 credit sales reporting rules of the 2008 Housing Bill and massively expands it by mandating that EVERY business transaction of $600 or more, whether it is cash, check, credit, or any other thing used for payment, to be reported to the IRS with 1099 forms.

For example, if a freelancer buys more than $600 dollars worth of office supplies over the course of a year from Staples, the individual will be required to 1099 Staples and to collect their Tax ID Number.

Additionally, small businesses and self-employed individuals will receive a 1099 form from each business that they sold over $600 worth of goods or services and will have to supply their Tax ID or Social Security Number to the purchaser.

Doug Shulman, IRS Commissioner, said that credit card and debit card purchases will be exempt from reporting with the 1099 forms because payment processors will already be reporting the transactions to the IRS. Under the guise of eliminating the burden of paperwork for small businesses and independents, this is really a step toward a cashless economy because people will want to avoid the extra paperwork and will embrace electronic transactions.

PayPal stands to benefit tremendously from a cashless economy and increased use.

Imagine a cashless economy where the banks are in charge of access to your money.  Recently, the National Australia Bank's had a computer glitch that left millions of people unable to get their own money.  Do the bankers really need any more power?

Cost of ruining small business.........$600
Cost of government stupidity.........Trillions
Dreams of the American people waking up and taking action..............Priceless
For everything else, there's MasterCard

GOLD AND SILVER

Gold and other precious metals will also be subject to the new rules, enabling the IRS to track gold ownership. Currently, gold is easy to transfer without tax because its value is intrinsic, or contained within the item itself.

According to the ObamaCare mandate, when precious metal dealers buy jewelry, coins or bullion from businesses or individuals they will be required to submit a 1099 form with Tax ID numbers or Social Security numbers from the sellers, which includes private individuals.

IRS EXPANSION

The government has expanded the power of the IRS in order to collect revenue that could be as high as $345 billion in taxes a year. The IRS is expected to add 16,500 new auditors, examiners and support staff. In 2009, the IRS employed over 93,000 people which includes 50,000 employees that work in the IRS examination, collection and investigation fields. The IRS spent only 50 cents for every $100 it collected.

In 2009, about 150 million income tax returns were filed and over 70 million people, or 42%, owed no income tax due to tax credits, deductions and exemptions, which are forms of welfare.

It is estimated that up to 30 million people do not file income tax returns at all. About 10 million of these people have paper trails following them because they receive W-2 or 1099 forms. The other 20 million deal in cash, have no records for wages or pensions or are affluent non-filers. However, failure to file a tax return can be like playing Russian roulette; while the current IRS audit rate is only about 1%, that number will increase with the addition of the 16,500 new agents.

WHO PAYS TAXES?

According to "The Great American Tax Dodge", the IRS is far more apt to go after middle-income non-filers and does not fully investigate affluent non-filers. The IRS uses the lame excuse that the rich may under-state the taxes owed and that the IRS would prefer nothing over under-stated taxes. It is more likely that the IRS avoids investigating the rich because they have resources to oppose the IRS.  The IRS is more apt to harass middle income earners who pay fines easily without a fight.

In 2009, small businesses employed half (60 million) of private sector non-agricultural workers; 15.5 million of those were self employed individuals. The IRS collected $1.36 TRILLION from individuals and $395 billion from corporations in 2007.

Most large American corporations like GE, Exxon, Google, MicroSoft and Berkshire Hathaway that have international operations pay very little or no taxes at all. This is accomplished by routing money through foreign countries with different tax laws and other loopholes.

While this may anger people, it is important to remember that corporations pass taxation costs on to the consumer, so the people buying the products bankroll corporate taxes.

CONCLUSIONS:

The left/right paradigm is an illusion: Bush's Housing Bill of 2008 and ObamaCare are companions.  It is worth noting that both parties work together to accomplish the same agenda.  In this case, it is total financial control, pressuring the middle class for hundreds of billions of dollars more in taxes and moving toward an electronic-based economy that shuns cash.  This is a very important point because people must give up this illusion in order to elect Constitutional leaders.

Many struggling small businesses will be crushed underneath the pressure of painstaking record-keeping, productivity loss and increased taxes. Failure of small businesses will create more unemployment. More unemployment will result in more welfare and reliance on the government. The government will then want more tax money.

The best way to cut the Gordian Knot is a clean sweep of these complicated and unfair laws.

SOLUTIONS:

Right now, individuals have the choice to protect their assets and privacy by turning away from credit and debit cards and trading in cash, precious metals and barter.  This would also bolster local economies.

The simplest way to get rid of ObamaCare is to forgo the lengthy repeal and litigation processes. The States can nullify this new law even before it goes into effect. If enough States nullify ObamaCare, it becomes invalid.

The 10th Amendment Center has written nullification legislation to get rid of ObamaCare.

The Corporate Excise Tax of 1909 is a separate animal from the 16th Amendment income tax established in 1913.  The cleanest way to eliminate IRS tyranny is for the States to nullify the 16th Amendment because it opposes the Constitution- it is a direct tax that fails uniform application.

The most accessible power lies with the States, so it is crucial to support Constitutional leaders who will apply the Tenth Amendment.


Buy 1 Get 2 Free at Botanic Choice Buy 1 Bottle and Get 2 FREE (select items), plus Free Shipping on $25+ Expires 12/31/2010

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

PureWaterFreedom

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

CNN Declares the Constitution Racist

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
September 22, 2010
In a discussion about Texas governor Rick Perry, CNN’s Rick Sanchez told Wayne Slater of the Dallas Morning News that “people of color” consider the Constitution — in particular the Tenth amendment — racist. Sanchez made his comment at 1:45 in the following video.
In essence, Sanchez said that if you believe that powers not granted to the federal government nor prohibited to the states by the Constitution are reserved to the states, you’re a racist. Sanchez’s remark is an obtuse reference to nullification, John C. Calhoun, and slavery.
In the 1840s and 1850s, the federal government tried to impose the Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850 and school segregation through Brown v. Board of Education on the Southern states. It was argued that these measures were unconstitutional and that the states had the inherent power to prevent the federal government from enforcing them within their borders.
In response to the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which provide a classic statement in support of states’ rights. Jefferson and Madison declared the Union is a voluntary association of states, and if the federal government violates that voluntary association with unconstitutional laws the states have the right to nullify those laws. The states, they wrote, “are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government” and “each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”
Nine states have passed resolutions reaffirming the principles of sovereignty under theConstitution and the 10th Amendment over the last year. The political opportunist Rick Perryexploited this trend last April at an anti-tax rally in Austin when he said Texans might get so fed up with the federal government they would want to leave the union. Democrats and other advocates of federal power over the states had a field day with Perry’s secession comment. “Talk of secession is an attack on our country. It can be nothing else. It is the ultimate anti-American statement,” declared Rep. Jim Dunnam of Waco.
Despite Mr. Dunnam’s contempt, a large number of Texans support the idea of states’ rights and even secession.
CNN and the corporate media have since used Perry’s comment as a lightning rod to portray constitutionalists as racist troglodytes. It is no mistake during the above clip CNN decided to show the consummate politician and opportunist Rick Perry parading around on horse back dressed in cowboy regalia. It underscores the stereotype of the white Southern massa lording over cotton field slaves. It reaffirms the racist narrative and attempts to drive people away from the sovereignty movement.
States’ rights as a not so subtle codeword for racism is now a corporate media talking point. In February, the teleprompter reader Chris Matthews at MSNBC compared Texan political candidate Debra Medina to John Calhoun after she defended the principles of interposition and nullification in response to the encroachments of the federal government.
None of this is accidental. It is imperative that the establishment attack the Constitution and the Bill of Rights if they are going to realize the globalist plan to merge our once proud constitutional republic into a world government. In addition to portraying the Constitution as a racist manifesto, they are attempting to criminalize the Tea Party and take down its political candidates.



Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Resist DC: Step by Step Plan for Freedom

Matthew Shea
Tenth Amendment Center
August 16, 2010
I, like many people, believe that the Constitution is not a living document.  The corollary to this principle is that if it is not living then it cannot die. However, the question of whether the Constitution is followed and enforced depends on you and me.  We introduced the legislation outlined in Part I of the plan and predictably many Obama defenders in our state House began calling us racist and secessionist. In fact, the quote from our Speaker Pro Tem Jeff Morris (D – Mount Vernon) was “We want to lead the state out of recession. They want to lead the state out of the country.”  Obviously, this is absurd.  The intent of the state sovereignty Bills are to erect barriers against an ever-encroaching federal bureaucracy, while keeping the nation unified. That said, Washington D. C. is on a course that will destroy our Constitutional Republic. Nationalized Health Care and a national Cap and Trade program will not lead us out of a recession but rather will further crush our economy.  If the federal government would get out of the way, we would be free as individual states to fix our own problems as the founders intended.[i]
To that end, recently some Attorneys General across the country are questioning the constitutionality of Nationalized Health Care.  In fact, at least 18 states are now suing the federal government claiming the $2.5 trillion healthcare system reform violates state sovereignty as protected in the U.S. Constitution and will force massive new spending on hard-pressed state governments.  Interestingly, some of the state Attorneys General claim that only the judicial branch may decide what is or is not constitutional but not state elected representatives or county sheriffs.[ii] This flies in the face of the requirement set forth in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution (Oath to support the Constitution binding both federal and state representatives).  To hold such a position renders that Oath of Office meaningless, and brings back the very scary proposition “befehl ist befehl” (an order is an order) used as a defense by Nazi officers at Nuremburg.  It is important to know where your State Attorney General stands on this issue because Part II of the plan deals with state and local enforcement of unconstitutional laws.
What follows is Part II of the plan.
Step 3:  Restore Sound and Honest Money
The control over the issuance of money is at the heart of sovereignty.  Our current fiat paper currency is losing value by the minute and you and I are paying for it by the day.  Most readers of this article know that since the Federal Reserve was created in 1913 in order to “provide a safer, more flexible banking and monetary system” and ensure “stability in the purchasing power of the dollar.” Since that time the US dollar has lost 97% of its value.  So what can we do at the state level?  In order to restore a system of sound money two immediate pieces of legislation can be introduced:
The more pressure states put on Congress to audit the Federal Reserve System, the greater the chance is that it will be exposed as a private group of bankers profiteering at public expense and then be phased out.  Like the state sovereignty resolutions, the Sound Money Resolution would put the government on notice to return to the original monetary system envisioned by our founders.[iii] This means an end to the fractional reserve banking as we know it and a return to currency that is backed by gold and silver and perhaps even commodities.
Dr. Edwin Viera Jr., a constitutional attorney and an expert in monetary theory who has litigated cases involving money issues, has said that the entire present monetary system is unconstitutional.  He proposes a precious-metals-based monetary system in which the state government collects part of its tax revenue from corporations in gold.  New Hampshire and Indiana, currently have that kind of legislation before them.  I would add that the next step should be to establish a private currency exchange in conjunction with a new monetary system.  This will be the subject of a future article.
Next, states can require the federal government to tender all payments in gold and silver.  The U.S. Constitution in Article 1 section 10 clearly states “No State shall…coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts…”[iv] The practical result of returning to this constitutional requirement will likely be the federal government ceasing to send any money to the states.  What an excellent day that would be! This would force states to budget and fix problems themselves without relying on federal handouts.  Another benefit will be ensuring state solvency even if the federal government goes bankrupt.  Lastly, it calls the bluff of the federal government.  You will recall in Part I of the plan the creation of a Federal Tax Escrow Account, which would offset this loss of money.  It will become immediately apparent which states send the federal government more money than they receive.
Step 4:  If State Legislatures Fail, Introduce the Laws through the Initiative Process
The people are the final check and balance because power is inherent in the people.  Many state legislatures will refuse to even hear the above ten bills when freedom-minded legislators introduce them.  Such was the case in my own state of Washington.  No matter.  In many states, the people have reserved for themselves the final power of legislation through the Initiative, Referendum, and Recall Process.
Twenty-four states currently have an Initiative process. Check here for the process in your state. Since the legislation is already written, it only needs to be slightly modified to include the words “Be it enacted by the people of [your state].”  Grassroots activists should be mindful that the ballot title and summary for an Initiative is going to require an attorney.  Identify them now (yes Constitutional freedom-minded Attorneys exist like Stephen Pidgeon of Everett, Washington).
Next, activists should contact all freedom groups and bring them together into one network on the Internet.  Remember that the Internet is to the state sovereignty movement what the printing press was to the Bible.  This is not centralized control but merely a way to quickly transmit to, and share information with, thousands of like-minded people.  For example, in Washington such a network called the “Liberty Groups” has started a state sovereignty initiative drive and website, Freedom Initiatives, and continues to share information and coordinate on many issues.  This is not about who leads what.Such squabbles must quickly give way to the overarching mission of restoring our Constitutional Republic. This is also not a Republican, Libertarian, Tea Party, or Democrat “thing” but a “we the people” reclaiming our country “thing.”
Before I move on, I want to address a couple of arguments that are typically raised by people who oppose the use of the Initiative process.  The arguments usually fall along three lines and I will answer each in turn:
1)      Direct Democracy is a dangerous thing and usually comes back around to bite you in the tail. This ignores the people as the final check and balance in our system. Furthermore, I believe we must exhaust all possible remedies at our disposal due to the urgency of the current situation.
2)      If the Initiative fails, practically speaking, it is impossible to bring the issue up again even decades later. This assumes we have decades.  The many experts I have read and talked to give our Constitutional Republic 6-10 years in a best-case scenario[v]and 6 months to 2 years worst case scenario.[vi] Now is the time to draw a line in the sand…our backs are against the wall.
3)      It wastes precious time and resources. This assumes an initiative will fail and also ignores the benefit of being able to educate voters through the Initiative process while simultaneously galvanizing a core grass roots team.  It also allows you to hold elected officials accountable by asking them point-blank “do you support the Initiative to nullify Nationalized Health Care?”
Step 5:  Contact all CountySheriffs and get them to commit to keep their oaths.
As described in Part I the whole principle of a Sheriff’s First bill is that no one is above the law…including federal agents.[vii] Federal agents will claim they “have the authority, period.” This begs a great question.  How will a law passed at the federal level be enforced locally?  The answer in almost every scenario involves the county Sheriff.  This is the Achilles Heel of almost all current federal schemes to socialize our economy. That is also why in most states ‘Task Forces” have been established to coordinate federal, state, and local law enforcement.  If all politics is local…it can fairly be said that so is all enforcement of criminal and civil penalties.
Consequently, the laws we have are only as good as those officers that enforce them at the local level.  Thus, the rise of tyranny must first come through both the United States Military and the County Sheriff.  And this can only happen if those same people violate their oaths to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution and their own State’s Constitution.  As discussed in Part I, the county Sheriff is the primary (chief) law enforcement officer in the United States.   Therefore, if you are an interested activist, you should make a personal visit to your County Sheriff.  Here are some ideas for your visit:
1. Ask if your Sheriff will become an Oath Keeper.  Oath Keepers is a nonprofit organization started by Stewart Rhodes (attorney and Army veteran) which advocates that its members (current and former military and law enforcement) uphold the Constitution of the United States should they be ordered to violate it.
2. Invite your Sheriff to publicly reaffirm his oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States and your respective state.
3. Give your Sheriff a copy of former Sheriff Richard Mack’s book The County Sheriff, America’s Last Hope.
4. Ask your Sheriff if he has a local “Safety Committee” or similar group, which is the modern day version of a posse and what the requirements are to join.[viii]Become engaged with the local Sheriff’s office, it will help them with critical manpower needs and, it will give you an opportunity to try and influence this critical link in our governmental chain.
Summary
5 Steps
1. Reclaim State Sovereignty through key Nullification Legislation
2. Erect an Impenetrable Barrier around the 2nd Amendment and the County Sheriff
3. Restore Sound and Honest Money
4. Introduce 10th Amendment Initiatives
5. Help your Sheriff become an Oath Keeper
10 Bills
There are many other ideas out there but we believed these would be quickest way to restore our Constitutional Republic.  This is not to say that securing our borders, state enforcement of immigration laws, repealing the 17th Amendment, eliminating 501(c)(3) for churches, reforming the elections process, restraining the courts, or restoring grand jury presentments are not important and worthy goals.  But the legislation as outlined above is the immediate priority.  To be clear, Legislation alone is not the answer nor do we need to change the face of our national government to change the direction of our country.     Ultimately the survival of our Constitutional Republic depends on the people.  It depends on the courage and boldness of each one of us.  It depends on each one of us answering “everything” to the question “what am I willing to sacrifice for freedom?” The fight for freedom is ultimately a matter of the heart before it is a county or state movement.  And so I pray you will help restore our Constitutional Republic so that our children and grandchildren may inherit, as we did, the blessings of liberty and freedom.
Jasper Roberts Consulting - Widget