Translate

GPA Store: Featured Products

Showing posts with label NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

False Dichotomy: Republican and Democrat

by Mark Daniels


The logical fallacy of false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either-or fallacy) involves a situation in which only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there are other options. Closely related are failing to consider a range of options and the tendency to think in extremes, called black-and-white thinking. Strictly speaking, the prefix "di" in "dilemma" means "two". When a list of more than two choices is offered, but there are other choices not mentioned, then the fallacy is called the fallacy of false choice, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses. (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)


two-party system is a form of party system where two major political parties dominate voting in nearly all elections, at every level. As a result, all, or nearly all, elected offices end up being held by candidates endorsed by one of the two major parties (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) In a two-party system, corruption abounds!


The Tyranny of the Two-Party SystemFiring Line with William F. Buckley Jr. "Is There a Role for a Third Party?"Third Party Candidate


When are "We The People" going to realize that the false dichotomy presented to us in the form of Republicans and Democrats and propagated by the "Mainstream Media" is a deliberate attempt to control "free-thinking" and implement a preconceived secret agenda


Don't you ever wonder why you are left dazed and confused by the statements and policies of the Republicans and Democrats?  Why you agree with Democrats on some issues and Republicans on others?  Why is it difficult to sometimes know who to elect?  Do you wonder why the elected representatives seldom, if ever, do what they promised?  


Do you ask yourself why the "mainstream media" is currently promoting racial and ethnic division.  Of course, they will say "we are only reporting the news" or "we are reporting what people want to hear".  The truth is that they are selling ideas; they are attempting to control what you hear and what you think.  Mass mind control is not a new idea!


You may say "we do have a problem with racial discrimination, illegal immigration, and drug trafficking,don't we?"  Yes, we do.  We have had these problems for a long time;  of course, the crime on the border is most likely linked to the drug trafficking, not illegal immigration.  Of course, just laws should be enforced concerning immigration and drug trafficking. Unfortunately, this becomes difficult to do when agencies of the government are involved in the drug trade, etc.


What each of us must realize is that these are "hot button" issues which have been presented on a non-stop basis by the "mainstream media" leading up to mid-term elections in an attempt to convince Americans to vote for either the Republicans or Democrats seldom mentioning an Independent or Third Party candidate, unless they are attacking the candidate or presenting some idiot as the "only" other option.  Both of these parties are controlled by the Global Elites.  They are puppets.  Congress is essentially a fiction; a powerless entity void of leadership, values, ethics, and character.  


I pray that it is not too late for the American people to Wake Up to this reality!  What can we do?  Plenty!  We must begin by sending a strong message in the upcoming election, refusing to vote for either a Democrat or a Republican, except Ron Paul, of course.  


Most importantly, we must Educate ourselves and others about the real issues affecting us: a secretive criminal enterprise mostly controlled by the International Bankers and their  organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the United Nations, the Federal Reserve, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, UNESCO, etc  have set out to destroy our national sovereignty while economically raping us.


Some of their organizations were secretive until recently (of course, I'm sure they have other secret groups), while others are front organizations which claim to represent noble aims, such as' ending poverty and bringing peace to the world.  Carefully examine what they have actually accomplished in these areas and you will quickly see through their lies.  We must educate ourselves about them and expose them to everyone. (You can start by doing some research right here on this site).  The information is available to anyone who does not want to keep their head in the sand!


Will you continue to attend the "False Dichotomy" theater productions or Are you ready to WAKE UP!


You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Related Article:  

The Third Rail Movement

CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLES ON CONSPIRACY DENIAL! 

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

CNN Declares the Constitution Racist

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
September 22, 2010
In a discussion about Texas governor Rick Perry, CNN’s Rick Sanchez told Wayne Slater of the Dallas Morning News that “people of color” consider the Constitution — in particular the Tenth amendment — racist. Sanchez made his comment at 1:45 in the following video.
In essence, Sanchez said that if you believe that powers not granted to the federal government nor prohibited to the states by the Constitution are reserved to the states, you’re a racist. Sanchez’s remark is an obtuse reference to nullification, John C. Calhoun, and slavery.
In the 1840s and 1850s, the federal government tried to impose the Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850 and school segregation through Brown v. Board of Education on the Southern states. It was argued that these measures were unconstitutional and that the states had the inherent power to prevent the federal government from enforcing them within their borders.
In response to the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which provide a classic statement in support of states’ rights. Jefferson and Madison declared the Union is a voluntary association of states, and if the federal government violates that voluntary association with unconstitutional laws the states have the right to nullify those laws. The states, they wrote, “are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government” and “each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”
Nine states have passed resolutions reaffirming the principles of sovereignty under theConstitution and the 10th Amendment over the last year. The political opportunist Rick Perryexploited this trend last April at an anti-tax rally in Austin when he said Texans might get so fed up with the federal government they would want to leave the union. Democrats and other advocates of federal power over the states had a field day with Perry’s secession comment. “Talk of secession is an attack on our country. It can be nothing else. It is the ultimate anti-American statement,” declared Rep. Jim Dunnam of Waco.
Despite Mr. Dunnam’s contempt, a large number of Texans support the idea of states’ rights and even secession.
CNN and the corporate media have since used Perry’s comment as a lightning rod to portray constitutionalists as racist troglodytes. It is no mistake during the above clip CNN decided to show the consummate politician and opportunist Rick Perry parading around on horse back dressed in cowboy regalia. It underscores the stereotype of the white Southern massa lording over cotton field slaves. It reaffirms the racist narrative and attempts to drive people away from the sovereignty movement.
States’ rights as a not so subtle codeword for racism is now a corporate media talking point. In February, the teleprompter reader Chris Matthews at MSNBC compared Texan political candidate Debra Medina to John Calhoun after she defended the principles of interposition and nullification in response to the encroachments of the federal government.
None of this is accidental. It is imperative that the establishment attack the Constitution and the Bill of Rights if they are going to realize the globalist plan to merge our once proud constitutional republic into a world government. In addition to portraying the Constitution as a racist manifesto, they are attempting to criminalize the Tea Party and take down its political candidates.



Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

Saturday, August 28, 2010

‘EU a disaster, illegal state built on false principles’

Russia Today
Friday, August 27, 2010
The European Union is a disaster and the UK should quit, says Gerard Batten, a European Parliament Member. RT met him in London.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

CNN: Opposition to Government, Bankers is Criminal

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
August 25, 2010
CNN’s Rick Sanchez and the tireless propaganda minister of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Mark Potok, have teamed up to demonize the Sovereign Citizen movement. In the intro to the piece below, Sanchez displays an overt disgust for the growing movement.


The FBI and Ministry of Homeland Security consider the movement a form of domestic terrorism. “The agency has already outlined two separate domestic terror threats — eco-terrorists/animal rights extremists and lone offenders — and its latest addition is a discussion of the Sovereign Citizen Movement,” the Homeland Security Newswire reported in April. “Members of the Sovereign Citizen Movement are anti-government extremists who believe that even though they physically reside in this country, they are separate or ‘sovereign’ from the United States. As a result, they believe they do not have to answer to any government authority, including courts, taxing entities, motor vehicle departments, or law enforcement.”



Naturally, because they refuse to obey the government, these folks are terrorists and the government is eager to have citizens who reflexively obey the government — and buy into what Sanchez and Potok say about the movement — rat them out. “You can help,” says the FBI. “First, ‘be crime smart’: don’t fall for the bogus claims and scams of sovereign citizens. And second, if you have information on any suspicious activities or crimes, please contact us.”
In May, the corporate media had a field day with the sovereign citizen philosophy when Joseph Kane and his 16 yearThe Missouri Information Analysis Center document leaked to Alex Jones last year specifically instructs police to be on the look-out for patriot bump stickers. Dangerous terrorists, according to MIAC, include Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin supporters. The Department of Homeland Security produced a similar document at approximately the same time warning officialdom and police of the threat posed by constitutionalists, advocates of the Second Amendment and returning veterans.
In the above clip, Potok is so eager to demonize the movement he claims it began as the progeny of white supremacists. The FBI does not go that far, but instead creates its own fallacious mythology.
The “FBI lists this extremist movement as a domestic terrorist threat, saying some ‘sovereign citizens’ murder, threaten judges, use fake currency and engineer various mortgage fraud scams. Many don’t pay taxes,” reports the Memphis Fox affiliate.
A cursory Google search of the claim sovereign citizens murder judges produces zero results, but there are plenty of instances of sovereign citizens eschewing federal and state paperwork, not paying taxes, ignoring laws and even going up against banksters in foreclosure cases — all terrorism, of course, according to the state.
Bankster minion Timothy Geithner didn’t pay taxes either, so I guess he is also a terrorist who secretly desires to kill judges and squat expensive condos.
Sarcasm aside, the sovereign citizen movement is considered a direct and dangerous threat by the government because it rejects out of hand its authority. That’s way Sanchez and the propagandist Potok talked about the movement in such strident terms. old son were gunned down by cops. According to police, Kane handed sovereign citizens paperwork to Arkansas police after he was pulled over. It is said Kane’s son then pulled out an AK 47 and killed two police officers. “West Memphis police recently finished training on how to identify the groups by peculiar license plates or bumper stickers. They were also taught how to best approach them during a traffic stop,” Fox News reported.

The Missouri Information Analysis Center document leaked to Alex Jones last year specifically instructs police to be on the look-out for patriot bump stickers. Dangerous terrorists, according to MIAC, include Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin supporters. The Department of Homeland Security produced a similar document at approximately the same time warning officialdom and police of the threat posed by constitutionalists, advocates of the Second Amendment and returning veterans.
In the above clip, Potok is so eager to demonize the movement he claims it began as the progeny of white supremacists. The FBI does not go that far, but instead creates its own fallacious mythology.
The “FBI lists this extremist movement as a domestic terrorist threat, saying some ‘sovereign citizens’ murder, threaten judges, use fake currency and engineer various mortgage fraud scams. Many don’t pay taxes,” reports the Memphis Fox affiliate.
A cursory Google search of the claim sovereign citizens murder judges produces zero results, but there are plenty of instances of sovereign citizens eschewing federal and state paperwork, not paying taxes, ignoring laws and even going up against banksters in foreclosure cases — all terrorism, of course, according to the state.
Bankster minion Timothy Geithner didn’t pay taxes either, so I guess he is also a terrorist who secretly desires to kill judges and squat expensive condos.
Sarcasm aside, the sovereign citizen movement is considered a direct and dangerous threat by the government because it rejects out of hand its authority. That’s way Sanchez and the propagandist Potok talked about the movement in such strident terms.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Resist DC: Step by Step Plan for Freedom

Matthew Shea
Tenth Amendment Center
August 16, 2010
I, like many people, believe that the Constitution is not a living document.  The corollary to this principle is that if it is not living then it cannot die. However, the question of whether the Constitution is followed and enforced depends on you and me.  We introduced the legislation outlined in Part I of the plan and predictably many Obama defenders in our state House began calling us racist and secessionist. In fact, the quote from our Speaker Pro Tem Jeff Morris (D – Mount Vernon) was “We want to lead the state out of recession. They want to lead the state out of the country.”  Obviously, this is absurd.  The intent of the state sovereignty Bills are to erect barriers against an ever-encroaching federal bureaucracy, while keeping the nation unified. That said, Washington D. C. is on a course that will destroy our Constitutional Republic. Nationalized Health Care and a national Cap and Trade program will not lead us out of a recession but rather will further crush our economy.  If the federal government would get out of the way, we would be free as individual states to fix our own problems as the founders intended.[i]
To that end, recently some Attorneys General across the country are questioning the constitutionality of Nationalized Health Care.  In fact, at least 18 states are now suing the federal government claiming the $2.5 trillion healthcare system reform violates state sovereignty as protected in the U.S. Constitution and will force massive new spending on hard-pressed state governments.  Interestingly, some of the state Attorneys General claim that only the judicial branch may decide what is or is not constitutional but not state elected representatives or county sheriffs.[ii] This flies in the face of the requirement set forth in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution (Oath to support the Constitution binding both federal and state representatives).  To hold such a position renders that Oath of Office meaningless, and brings back the very scary proposition “befehl ist befehl” (an order is an order) used as a defense by Nazi officers at Nuremburg.  It is important to know where your State Attorney General stands on this issue because Part II of the plan deals with state and local enforcement of unconstitutional laws.
What follows is Part II of the plan.
Step 3:  Restore Sound and Honest Money
The control over the issuance of money is at the heart of sovereignty.  Our current fiat paper currency is losing value by the minute and you and I are paying for it by the day.  Most readers of this article know that since the Federal Reserve was created in 1913 in order to “provide a safer, more flexible banking and monetary system” and ensure “stability in the purchasing power of the dollar.” Since that time the US dollar has lost 97% of its value.  So what can we do at the state level?  In order to restore a system of sound money two immediate pieces of legislation can be introduced:
The more pressure states put on Congress to audit the Federal Reserve System, the greater the chance is that it will be exposed as a private group of bankers profiteering at public expense and then be phased out.  Like the state sovereignty resolutions, the Sound Money Resolution would put the government on notice to return to the original monetary system envisioned by our founders.[iii] This means an end to the fractional reserve banking as we know it and a return to currency that is backed by gold and silver and perhaps even commodities.
Dr. Edwin Viera Jr., a constitutional attorney and an expert in monetary theory who has litigated cases involving money issues, has said that the entire present monetary system is unconstitutional.  He proposes a precious-metals-based monetary system in which the state government collects part of its tax revenue from corporations in gold.  New Hampshire and Indiana, currently have that kind of legislation before them.  I would add that the next step should be to establish a private currency exchange in conjunction with a new monetary system.  This will be the subject of a future article.
Next, states can require the federal government to tender all payments in gold and silver.  The U.S. Constitution in Article 1 section 10 clearly states “No State shall…coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts…”[iv] The practical result of returning to this constitutional requirement will likely be the federal government ceasing to send any money to the states.  What an excellent day that would be! This would force states to budget and fix problems themselves without relying on federal handouts.  Another benefit will be ensuring state solvency even if the federal government goes bankrupt.  Lastly, it calls the bluff of the federal government.  You will recall in Part I of the plan the creation of a Federal Tax Escrow Account, which would offset this loss of money.  It will become immediately apparent which states send the federal government more money than they receive.
Step 4:  If State Legislatures Fail, Introduce the Laws through the Initiative Process
The people are the final check and balance because power is inherent in the people.  Many state legislatures will refuse to even hear the above ten bills when freedom-minded legislators introduce them.  Such was the case in my own state of Washington.  No matter.  In many states, the people have reserved for themselves the final power of legislation through the Initiative, Referendum, and Recall Process.
Twenty-four states currently have an Initiative process. Check here for the process in your state. Since the legislation is already written, it only needs to be slightly modified to include the words “Be it enacted by the people of [your state].”  Grassroots activists should be mindful that the ballot title and summary for an Initiative is going to require an attorney.  Identify them now (yes Constitutional freedom-minded Attorneys exist like Stephen Pidgeon of Everett, Washington).
Next, activists should contact all freedom groups and bring them together into one network on the Internet.  Remember that the Internet is to the state sovereignty movement what the printing press was to the Bible.  This is not centralized control but merely a way to quickly transmit to, and share information with, thousands of like-minded people.  For example, in Washington such a network called the “Liberty Groups” has started a state sovereignty initiative drive and website, Freedom Initiatives, and continues to share information and coordinate on many issues.  This is not about who leads what.Such squabbles must quickly give way to the overarching mission of restoring our Constitutional Republic. This is also not a Republican, Libertarian, Tea Party, or Democrat “thing” but a “we the people” reclaiming our country “thing.”
Before I move on, I want to address a couple of arguments that are typically raised by people who oppose the use of the Initiative process.  The arguments usually fall along three lines and I will answer each in turn:
1)      Direct Democracy is a dangerous thing and usually comes back around to bite you in the tail. This ignores the people as the final check and balance in our system. Furthermore, I believe we must exhaust all possible remedies at our disposal due to the urgency of the current situation.
2)      If the Initiative fails, practically speaking, it is impossible to bring the issue up again even decades later. This assumes we have decades.  The many experts I have read and talked to give our Constitutional Republic 6-10 years in a best-case scenario[v]and 6 months to 2 years worst case scenario.[vi] Now is the time to draw a line in the sand…our backs are against the wall.
3)      It wastes precious time and resources. This assumes an initiative will fail and also ignores the benefit of being able to educate voters through the Initiative process while simultaneously galvanizing a core grass roots team.  It also allows you to hold elected officials accountable by asking them point-blank “do you support the Initiative to nullify Nationalized Health Care?”
Step 5:  Contact all CountySheriffs and get them to commit to keep their oaths.
As described in Part I the whole principle of a Sheriff’s First bill is that no one is above the law…including federal agents.[vii] Federal agents will claim they “have the authority, period.” This begs a great question.  How will a law passed at the federal level be enforced locally?  The answer in almost every scenario involves the county Sheriff.  This is the Achilles Heel of almost all current federal schemes to socialize our economy. That is also why in most states ‘Task Forces” have been established to coordinate federal, state, and local law enforcement.  If all politics is local…it can fairly be said that so is all enforcement of criminal and civil penalties.
Consequently, the laws we have are only as good as those officers that enforce them at the local level.  Thus, the rise of tyranny must first come through both the United States Military and the County Sheriff.  And this can only happen if those same people violate their oaths to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution and their own State’s Constitution.  As discussed in Part I, the county Sheriff is the primary (chief) law enforcement officer in the United States.   Therefore, if you are an interested activist, you should make a personal visit to your County Sheriff.  Here are some ideas for your visit:
1. Ask if your Sheriff will become an Oath Keeper.  Oath Keepers is a nonprofit organization started by Stewart Rhodes (attorney and Army veteran) which advocates that its members (current and former military and law enforcement) uphold the Constitution of the United States should they be ordered to violate it.
2. Invite your Sheriff to publicly reaffirm his oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States and your respective state.
3. Give your Sheriff a copy of former Sheriff Richard Mack’s book The County Sheriff, America’s Last Hope.
4. Ask your Sheriff if he has a local “Safety Committee” or similar group, which is the modern day version of a posse and what the requirements are to join.[viii]Become engaged with the local Sheriff’s office, it will help them with critical manpower needs and, it will give you an opportunity to try and influence this critical link in our governmental chain.
Summary
5 Steps
1. Reclaim State Sovereignty through key Nullification Legislation
2. Erect an Impenetrable Barrier around the 2nd Amendment and the County Sheriff
3. Restore Sound and Honest Money
4. Introduce 10th Amendment Initiatives
5. Help your Sheriff become an Oath Keeper
10 Bills
There are many other ideas out there but we believed these would be quickest way to restore our Constitutional Republic.  This is not to say that securing our borders, state enforcement of immigration laws, repealing the 17th Amendment, eliminating 501(c)(3) for churches, reforming the elections process, restraining the courts, or restoring grand jury presentments are not important and worthy goals.  But the legislation as outlined above is the immediate priority.  To be clear, Legislation alone is not the answer nor do we need to change the face of our national government to change the direction of our country.     Ultimately the survival of our Constitutional Republic depends on the people.  It depends on the courage and boldness of each one of us.  It depends on each one of us answering “everything” to the question “what am I willing to sacrifice for freedom?” The fight for freedom is ultimately a matter of the heart before it is a county or state movement.  And so I pray you will help restore our Constitutional Republic so that our children and grandchildren may inherit, as we did, the blessings of liberty and freedom.

Friday, August 13, 2010

Mao, Blood-Lust and The Scientific Dictatorship

Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars.com
August 13, 2010
They (the Gods) all want me to give them something to drink. They have worked well for me. They have helped me. Now they are all hot. They’re thirsty. They want to drink. They want to drink blood. Then I drink blood. I swallow it. I give it to them. And that quiets them. That calms them. That refreshes them...”
From La Psychologie religieuse des Achumawi: Description of an ancient sacrificial rite performed by an Achomawi-shaman.
obamalights.jpg
In their June, 2010 magazine-issue, the Dutch Central Bank portrayed mass-murderer Mao Zedong arrogantly on the cover. By blatantly depicting the mass-murderer’s face the Bankers not only dance on the graves of the dictator’s victims, they’re dancing on the graves of their own victims- as Mao was directly put in power by the global bankers. Besides being directly responsible for the murder of at least 20 million people, Mao was also in the habit of kidnapping, raping and murdering young women for his royal pleasure. These historical facts have not deterred the Dutch Central Bank.
This is just one example of the unbridled hubris with which the banks throw their blood-lust in your face. But the blood-lust is more than lust. It’s a belief-system, a cult, that has infiltrated politics, economics, military and, last but not least, science.
Diamond at the Core
They say that science smothered mysticism with a rag drenched in arsenic. They were wrong. They were negligent. The truth is, mysticism has finally found its natural expression in the language of science.
Besides communicating in the usual symbolic imagery, designed to influence emotion, its new voice has learned to speak in formulas, equations and diagrams, appealing to the intellect as well.
In sketching out the contours of the scientific dictatorship, obviously no one example will suffice. One may casually use the analogy of a great tree-trunk, out of which countless branches grow. Perhaps the symbol of a three-headed snake approaches the subject more accurately. But there is no need to besmear the symbol for the sake of the analogy. So, without further insulting the noble tree and magnificent snake, let’s grab a magnifying glass and climb upon the dragon to find what we may under its scales.
Take this one for example: Human Impact (I) on the environment equals the product of population (P), affluence (A: consumption per capita) and technology (T: environmental impact per unit of consumption).
Perfect logic, you would think. So was the eugenic formula of the Nazi’s, who were in the business of carefully measuring the distance from the nose to lower forehead, on the bases of which the decision was made who to sterilize or put to death. These are cleverly devised formulas of death, as calculated into existence by small groups of elites with the specific purpose of building a foundation for future mass-killings. The black diamond shimmering at the core of its religion is death, and all action is polished in such a shape, as to convince the smartest minds to join in. But the formula presented here is more than just some cynical ruse to convert the finest minds in science. It represents a belief-system that formulas inherently carry power, as do symbols and words. This power is then transferred from them to those they seek to subdue. A strange plot, and an ingenious one at that, seamlessly following the rules of mass conditioning, and injected by the thinnest of needles.
There is one golden rule, of course, that makes all the difference and guarantees that the mapmakers of the scientific dictatorship maintain the upper hand. They must, in short, be smarter than those on the receiving end of the transfer. Otherwise the whole endeavour would be as impossible as a plumber advising a brain-surgeon where exactly in the frontal lobe to operate. Also for the trick to have effect, they must be in control of certain key-points in the overall infrastructure, not necessarily all points. If we are to understand anything, if we even wish to, we must trace their footprints and enter the labyrinth with the strongest fishing-ropes tight around our waists. It is easy to get lost here, after all, especially considering the thick fog that envelops it. But with an ounce of diligence and a gram of courage we will learn that their countless disguises are as manifold as those ceremonial masks from sub-Saharan Africa.
Tricks and Devices
“Read their documents!”, Jones states at the end. And so it is. Everything there is to understand comes more or less free of charge. A simple library-card and access to the internet are all one needs when climbing down into the pit. The costs saved however, are equalled by the time and effort invested. It requires continuous study, intense inspection of government-documents to gain some understanding of the tricks and devices with which the scientific dictatorship holds free humanity in its grip. And you won’t emerge smiling from the pit, if you emerge at all. As everyone knows who has studied the matter for more than a day, the publications issued by the big foundations are cluttered with ominous sub-paragraphs that will make you wring your hands. One moment you’re glancing over some technical paper by the RAND-corporation, the next you realize you’ve been reading the gospel according to Satan. The most dehumanizing suggestions are being presented almost casually, in a matter-of-fact manner, making the average person shrug his shoulder and move on. It takes a sharpened eye to detect the grave atrocities that lay buried  under scientific explanations, diagrams and other comforting systems that leave us confounded in suspended disbelief. Study long and intense enough, and you’ll come to understand the common denominator.
Blood Offerings
If there is one constant in human history, it’s the practice of ritual sacrifice. Priests of power within any system, be it tribal or otherwise, have been in the habit of “satisfying the gods” with some kind of offering placed humbly at the deity’s feet. Without plunging into an endless anthropological exposé, archaeological excavations from Germany to South-America and ancient Mesopotamia have revealed that such practices were very much commonplace. Just as commonplace, incidentally, as the clapping-in-irons of free men.
Were the “gods” in the old days still an untouchable outside force, and the priests but mediators communicating their commands, today the elites have replaced them by their own countenance. But the contrast is superficial. Regardless of the question who occupies the god-seat at any one time, the offering has remained the same throughout the ages.

“Let there be floods of the blood of the bourgeois”, Vladimir Iljitsj Lenin confided to a Bolshevik newspaper in 1918. ” More blood, as much as possible.”
It is this quiet, unspoken belief that by bringing about mass-death, the members gain divine powers, their claim to rule safeguarded. It’s the ancient principle of the hunter, acquiring the life-blood of the hunted projected onto the globe. Now how to accomplish this lethal objective. Well, first let’s answer the who-question. What entity has the ability and capacity to exterminate life on a massive scale? And who has proven to do so according to the historical record? Asking the question equals answering it. Government, of course.
Now, what sort of government could exterminate the most amount of people? National or global? Again, there is no question. And there you have it. But global government, however feverishly it is being pursued, it still only a means to an end. By accumulating political and economic power, coordinated on a global scale, those in the god-seat acquire not only sovereign rule over the planet, they can rule with the powers attributed to a god: power over life and death. And that means: life for them, death for us.
The Scientific Dictatorship
It wasn’t necessary to slander either the tree or the snake to make the point. We face an enemy discouragingly massive in scope. But, to make it rime, there is every reason to hope. The obvious attempts to “control fertility” are meeting with more resistance than they must have expected. The eugenicists, as they pose as environmentalists, are being exposed at every turn for what they are: members of an elite death-cult, celebrating death with the assistance of science, under cover of science, quenching their thirst for blood with the motto: killing one may activate a cell; killing many, revitalises the entire body.

Why Treasury Securities?

What are Treasury Securities and why is the Federal Reserve investing in them?
by Mark Daniels

The easiest answer to the first question is provided by Wikipedia which I have posted here. Please review the information provided by Wikipedia to gain a cursory knowledge of the subject.  If you wold like to obtain  a more in depth knowledge of the subject, I recommend reading The Bond Book: Everything Investors Need to Know About Treasuries, Municipals, GNMAs, Corporates, Zeros, Bond Funds, Money Market Funds, and MoreTreasury-Federal Reserve study of the Government securities market, or Treasury Options for Institutional Investors. If you want to understand how the bailouts hurt investors, please read Bailout: What the Rescue of Bear Stearns and the Credit Crisis Mean for Your Investments.You may also want to read Mortgaged And Armed: A Key to Understanding Mortgage Industry Tactics

The Federal Reserve is investing in Treasury Securities simply because it is the "only" safe investment when economic collapse is imminent.  Additionally, the Federal Reserve has run out of tools to manipulate the U.S. and Global Markets.  The transfer of wealth is mostly complete.  What will happen when the economy collapses?  The Federal Reserve, which is actually controlled by a Cartel of Central Bankers will use their investment in U.S. Treasury Securities to basically "take over" America, "We The People".  

We are rather close to the final chapter in the Globalist plot to establish a Global Government.  We are already witnessing the destruction of the U.S. Dollar (Economy, Private Property, Development, etc) and the U.S. Constitution (Bill of Rights, Liberty, Freedom, Separation of Powers, etc).

What's next?  Increased Taxes!  What most people do not realize is that our only real enemy is the Global Power Structure which is best identified as the Central Bankers.  The plan to sheer the People of the world of every last piece of property and dignity is almost complete.  As most people in Finance know, you don't want to destroy your source of labor and income until you have no other choice. Well, they have essentially ran out of options to maintain the current system of Economic Rape!

If you are saying to yourself, "he's crazy", then you have failed to do your homework.  You can start by reading "Secrets of the Federal Reserve" posted here in it's entirety so that you can read it for free.

The next phase will have to involve the establishment of a Police State to control the "terrorists" aka  "We the People" around the world, the implementation of various population control techniques,i.e.Eugenics, and the establishment of Surveillance technology.




United States Treasury security

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


United States Treasury security is government debt issued by the United States Department of the Treasury through the Bureau of the Public Debt. Treasury securities are the debtfinancing instruments of the United States Federal government, and they are often referred to simply as Treasuries. There are four types of marketable treasury securities: Treasury billsTreasury notesTreasury bonds, and Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS). There are several types of non-marketable treasury securities including State and Local Government Series (SLGS), Government Account Series debt issued to government-managed trust funds, and savings bonds. All of the marketable Treasury securities are very liquidand are heavily traded on the secondary market. The non-marketable securities (such as savings bonds) are issued to subscribers and cannot be transferred through market sales.



History



The U.S. government knew that the costs of World War I would be great, and the question of how to pay for the war was matter of intense debate. The resulting decision was to pay for the war with a balance between higher taxes (see the War Tax Act) and government debt. Traditionally, the government borrowed from other countries, but there were no other countries from which to borrow in 1917: U.S. citizens would have to fully finance the war through both higher taxes and purchases of war bonds.[1]
The Treasury raised funding throughout the war by floating $21.5 billion in 'Liberty bonds.' These bonds were sold at subscription where officials created coupon price and then sold it atPar value. At this price, subscriptions could be filled in as little as one day, but usually remained open for several weeks, depending on demand for the bond.[1]
After the war, the Liberty Bonds were reaching maturity, but the Treasury was unable to pay each down fully with only limited budget surpluses. The resolution to this problem was to refinance the debt with variable short and medium-term maturities. Again the Treasury issued debt through fixed-price subscription, where both the coupon and the price of the debt were dictated by the treasury.[1]
The problems with debt issuance became apparent in the late-1920's. The system suffered from chronic oversubscription, where interest rates were so attractive that there were more purchasers of debt than supplied by the government. This indicated that the government was paying too much for debt. As government debt was undervalued, debt purchasers could buy from the government and immediately sell to another market participant at a higher price.[1]
In 1929, the U.S. Treasury shifted from the fixed-price subscription system to a system of auctioning where 'Treasury Bills' would be sold to the highest bidder. Securities were then issued on a pro rata system where securities would be allocated to the highest bidder until their demand was full. If more treasuries were supplied by the government, they would then be allocated to the next highest bidder. This system allowed the market to set the price rather than the government. On December 10, 1929, the Treasury issued its first auction. The result was the issuing of $224 million three-month bills. The highest bid was at 99.310 with the lowest bid accepted at 99.152.[1]
Foreign countries later started to buy U.S. debt as an investment of their surplus U.S. Dollars. There is fear that foreign countries hold so many bonds that if they stopped buying them, the U.S. economy would collapse; however, the reality is that more bonds are transferred in a single day by the Treasury than are held by any single sovereign state.[2] The perception of this dependence furthers belief that the U.S. and China economies are so tightly linked that both fear the consequences of a potential slow down in China's purchase of those bonds. In her visit to China, U.S. State Secretary Hillary Clinton called on authorities in Beijing to continue buying U.S. Treasuries, saying it would help jumpstart the flagging U.S. economy and stimulate imports of Chinese goods.[3]
As the economic recession continues, more doubts arise over the real value of U.S. treasury securities. Though carefully worded, Chinese premier Wen Jia Bao's warning about possible devaluation of Chinese held U.S. bonds was taken very seriously by Washington:
"Of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest, I'm a little bit worried" ... "I would like to call on the United States to honor its words, stay a credible nation and ensure the safety of Chinese assets."[4] - Chinese premierWen Jiabao, said at a news conference after the closing of China's 2009 legislative session.
However, it is important to note that such comments, while critical, were very likely indicative of Chinese "gesturing" ahead of the April 1st G-20 Economic Summit. As of April 2009, the U.S. dollar had rallied YTD against all other major world currencies. On March 18, 2009, the Federal Reserve used quantitative easing "to help improve conditions in private credit markets, the Committee decided to purchase up to $300 billion of longer-term Treasury securities over the next six months."[5]

[edit]Marketable securities

[edit]Directly issued by the United States Government

[edit]Treasury bill

Treasury bills (or T-Billsmature in one year or less. Like zero-coupon bonds, they do not pay interest prior to maturity; instead they are sold at a discount of the par value to create a positive yield to maturity. Many regard Treasury bills as the least risky investment available to U.S. investors[citation needed].
Regular weekly T-Bills are commonly issued with maturity dates of 28 days (or 4 weeks, about a month), 91 days (or 13 weeks, about 3 months), 182 days (or 26 weeks, about 6 months), and 364 days (or 52 weeks, about 1 year). Treasury bills are sold by single price auctions held weekly. Offering amounts for 13-week and 26-week bills are announced each Thursday for auction, usually at 11:30 a.m., on the following Monday and settlement, or issuance, on Thursday. Offering amounts for 4-week bills are announced on Monday for auction the next day, Tuesday, usually at 11:30 a.m., and issuance on Thursday. Offering amounts for 52-week bills are announced every fourth Thursday for auction the next Tuesday, usually at 11:30 am, and issuance on Thursday. Purchase orders at TreasuryDirect must be entered before 11:00 on the Monday of the auction. The minimum purchase, effective April 7, 2008, is $100. (This amount formerly had been $1,000.) Mature T-bills are also redeemed on each Thursday. Banks and financial institutions, especially primary dealers, are the largest purchasers of T-bills.
Like other securities, individual issues of T-bills are identified with a unique CUSIP number. The 13-week bill issued three months after a 26-week bill is considered a re-opening of the 26-week bill and is given the same CUSIP number. The 4-week bill issued two months after that and maturing on the same day is also considered a re-opening of the 26-week bill and shares the same CUSIP number. For example, the 26-week bill issued on March 22, 2007, and maturing on September 20, 2007, has the same CUSIP number (912795A27) as the 13-week bill issued on June 21, 2007, and maturing on September 20, 2007, and as the 4-week bill issued on August 23, 2007 that matures on September 20, 2007.
During periods when Treasury cash balances are particularly low, the Treasury may sell cash management bills (or CMBs). These are sold at a discount and by auction just like weekly Treasury bills. They differ in that they are irregular in amount, term (often less than 21 days), and day of the week for auction, issuance, and maturity. When CMBs mature on the same day as a regular weekly bill, usually Thursday, they are said to be on-cycle. The CMB is considered another reopening of the bill and has the same CUSIP. When CMBs mature on any other day, they are off-cycle and have a different CUSIP number.
Treasury bills are quoted for purchase and sale in the secondary market on an annualized discount percentage, or basis.
With the advent of TreasuryDirect, individuals can now purchase T-Bills online and have funds withdrawn from and deposited directly to their personal bank account and earn higher interest rates on their savings.
General calculation for the discount yield for Treasury bills is
\text{Discount Yield} (%) = \frac{\text{Face Value} - \text{Purchase Price}}{\text{Face Value}} \times \frac{\text{360}}{\text{Days Till Maturity}} \times 100%

[edit]Treasury note

This is the modern usage of "Treasury Note" in the U.S., for the earlier meanings see Treasury Note (disambiguation).
Treasury notes (or T-Notes) mature in one to ten years. They have a coupon payment every six months, and are commonly issued with maturities dates between 1 to 10 years, with denominations of $1,000. In the basic transaction, one buys a "$1,000" T-Note for say, $950, collects interest over 10 years of say, 3% per year, which comes to $30 yearly, and at the end of the 10 years cashes it in for $1000. So, $950 over the course of 10 years becomes $1300.
T-Notes and T-Bonds are quoted on the secondary market at percentage of par in thirty-seconds of a point (n/32 of a point, where n = 1,2,3,...). Thus, for example, a quote of 95:07 on a note indicates that it is trading at a discount: $952.19 (i.e., 95 + 7/32%) for a $1,000 bond. (Several different notations may be used for bond price quotes. The example of 95 and 7/32 points may be written as 95:07, or 95-07, or 95'07, or decimalized as 95.21875.) Other notation includes a +, which indicates 1/64 points and a third digit may be specified to represent 1/256 points. Examples include 95:07+ which equates to (95 + 7/32 + 1/64) and 95:073 which equates to (95 + 7/32 + 3/256). Notation such as 95:073+ is unusual and not typically used.
The 10-year Treasury note has become the security most frequently quoted when discussing the performance of the U.S. government bond market and is used to convey the market's take on longer-term macroeconomic expectations.

[edit]Treasury bond

"U.S. Bonds" redirects here. You may be looking for the singer Gary U.S. Bonds.
Treasury bonds (T-Bonds, or the long bond) have the longest maturity, from twenty years to thirty years. They have a coupon payment every six months like T-Notes, and are commonly issued with maturity of thirty years. The secondary market is highly liquid, so the yield on the most recent T-Bond offering was commonly used as a proxy for long-term interest rates in general.[citation needed] This role has largely been taken over by the 10-year note, as the size and frequency of long-term bond issues declined significantly in the 1990s and early 2000s.
The U.S. Federal government suspended issuing the well-known 30-year Treasury bonds (often called long-bonds) for a four and a half year period starting October 31, 2001 and concluding February 2006.[6] As the U.S. government used its budget surpluses to pay down the Federal debt in the late 1990s,[7] the 10-year Treasury note began to replace the 30-year Treasury bond as the general, most-followed metric of the U.S. bond market. However, because of demand from pension funds and large, long-term institutional investors, along with a need to diversify the Treasury's liabilities - and also because the flatter yield curve meant that the opportunity cost of selling long-dated debt had dropped - the 30-year Treasury bond was re-introduced in February 2006 and is now issued quarterly.[8] This brought the U.S. in line with Japan and European governments issuing longer-dated maturities amid growing global demand from pension funds.[citation needed]

[edit]TIPS

Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (or TIPS) are the inflation-indexed bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury. The principal is adjusted to the Consumer Price Index, the commonly used measure of inflation. The coupon rate is constant, but generates a different amount of interest when multiplied by the inflation-adjusted principal, thus protecting the holder against inflation. TIPS are currently offered in 5-year, 10-year and 30-year maturities.[9]

[edit]Top Foreign holders of U.S. Treasuries

As of January 2010:
HolderTotal
China$889.0 billion
Japan$765.4 billion
Oil Exporters$218.4 billion
United Kingdom$206.0 billion
Brazil$169.1 billion
Source: the United States Treasury.[10]

[edit]Created by the Financial Industry

[edit]STRIPS

Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal Securities (or STRIPS) are T-Notes, T-Bonds and TIPS whose interest and principal portions of the security have been separated, or "stripped"; these may then be sold separately (in units of $1000 face value) in the secondary market. The name derives from the days before computerization, when paper bonds were physically traded; traders would literally tear the interest coupons off of paper securities for separate resale.
The government does not directly issue STRIPS; they are formed by investment banks or brokerage firms, but the government does register STRIPS in its book-entry system. They cannot be bought through TreasuryDirect, but only through a broker.
STRIPS are used by the Treasury and split into individual principal and interest payments, which get resold in the form of zero-coupon bonds. Because they then pay no interest, there is not any interest to re-invest, and so there is no reinvestment risk with STRIPS.

[edit]Nonmarketable securities

[edit]Zero-Percent Certificate of Indebtedness

The "Certificate of Indebtedness" is a Treasury security that does not earn any interest and has no fixed maturity. It can only be held in a TreasuryDirect account and bought or sold directly through the Treasury. It is intended to be used as a source of funds for traditional Treasury security purchases. Purchases and redemptions can be made at any time.[citation needed]

[edit]Government Account Series

Government Account Series Treasuries are the principal form of intragovernmental debt holdings.[11] Surpluses from the Social Security Trust Fund are invested in this type of security.[citation needed]

[edit]U.S. Savings Bonds

Savings bonds were created to finance World War I, and were originally called Liberty Bonds. In 2002, the Treasury Department started to gut the savings bond program by lowering interest and closing its marketing offices, although the program was very well known previously.[12]

[edit]Series EE

Series EE bonds are issued at 50% of their face value and reach final maturity 30 years from issuance. Interest is added to the bond monthly and paid when the holder cashes the bond. They are designed to reach face value in approximately 17 years, although an investor can hold them for up to 30 years and continue to accrue interest. For bonds issued before May 2005 the rate of interest is recomputed every six months at 90% of the average five-year Treasury yield for the preceding six months. Bonds issued in May 2005 or later pay a fixed interest rate for the life of the bond, although the Treasury does guarantee that the bond will reach face value after 20 years. In the space of a decade, interest dropped from well over 5% to 0.7% for new bonds in 2009.[13]
Interest is taxable at the federal level only. Investors can elect to defer taxation until the bond ceases to pay interest (30 years after issuance) or until it is redeemed.
Series EE bonds are designed for individual investors, sold at a discount, and redeemed at an amount that includes the interest income. Hence, while interest is calculated monthly, the interest on a Series EE bond is not paid until redemption.
All Series I Savings Bonds and Series EE Savings Bonds issued in May 1997 or later increase in value monthly. All other Savings Bonds, including Series HH bonds issued after May 1997, pay interest on a six-month cycle. These bonds should be cashed near the beginning of their month of issue or of the month exactly six months later.

[edit]Series HH

Series HH bonds are sold at a discount and mature at face value. Unlike T-Bonds (Treasury Bonds) and agency issues, Series HH bonds are nonmarketable. They also pay interest semi-annually, as do most bonds.
Issuance of Series HH bonds stopped as of August 31, 2004, but there are still many yet that have not matured.[14][15]

[edit]Series I

Series I bonds are issued at face value and have a variable yield based on inflation. The interest rate consists of two components: the first is a fixed rate which will remain constant over the life of the bond and the second is a variable rate reset every six months from the time the bond is purchased based on the current inflation rate. New rates go into effect on May 1 and November 1 of every year.[16] The fixed rate is determined by the Treasury Department; the variable component is based on the Consumer Price Index from a six month period ending one month prior to the reset time. Interest accrues monthly, in full, on the first day of the month (i.e., a Savings Bond will have the same value on July 1 as on July 31, but on August 1 its value will increase for the August interest accrual).
Like EE bonds, I bonds are issued to individuals with a limit of $5,000 per person (by Social Security number) per year.[17] A person may purchase the limit of both paper and electronic bonds for a total of $10,000 per year. Redeeming the bonds before five years will incur a penalty of three months of interest.[18] The Treasury Department announced in early November 2008 the return of a fixed rate component, which the Treasury removed in July. For newly purchased securities, the Series I will pay 0.7% fixed annual rate, in addition to the inflation adjustment. Combining the fixed rate and the inflation adjustment as of November 2008, new I-bonds will earn interest at a 5.64% annual percentage rate.[19]

[edit]See also

[edit]References

  1. a b c d e Garbade, Kenneth D. "Why The U.S. Treasury Began Auctioning Treasury Bills in 1929." Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Vol. 14, No. 1, July 2008.
  2. ^ "Wholesale Securities Services, Program Data". U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Public Debt.
  3. ^ [1][dead link]
  4. ^ [2][dead link]
  5. ^ Retrieved on March 18, 2009
  6. ^ "Treasury Reintroduces 30-Year Bond". U.S. Department of the Treasury.
  7. ^ "The United States on Track to Pay Off the Debt by End of the Decade". 2000-12-28. Retrieved 2009-10-23.
  8. ^ "Table of Treasury Securities". U.S. Department of the Treasury.
  9. ^ Treasury Direct, TIPS accessed 2010-05-26
  10. ^ Major Foreign Holders of Treasury Securities
  11. ^ "Monthly Statement of the Public Debt of the United States" (PDF). 2009-09-30. Retrieved 2009-11-04.
  12. ^ Pender, Kathleen (December 3, 2007). "Treasury takes new whack at savings bonds"The San Francisco Chronicle (Hearst). Retrieved 2007-02-14.
  13. ^ "Series EE/E Savings Bond Rates". U.S. Department of the Treasury. Retrieved 2008-07-19.
  14. ^ "Individual - HH/H Savings Bonds". Treasurydirect.gov. Retrieved 2010-03-25.
  15. ^ "Government Will Honor Discontinued HH Bonds - Los Angeles Times". Articles.latimes.com. Retrieved 2010-03-25.
  16. ^ I Savings Bond Historical Rates and Terms - Treasury Direct
  17. ^ Annual Purchase Limit For Savings Bonds Set at $5,000 - Treasury Direct (accessed on 2009-02-17). The annual $5000 limit was effective on January 1, 2008. The earlier limit of $30000 was set in 2003.
  18. ^ I Bonds at a Glance - Treasury Direct
  19. ^ "U.S. adds fixed rate return to new 'i-series'savings bonds". L.A. Times. Retrieved 2008-11-05.

[edit]External links

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
































Jasper Roberts Consulting - Widget