Bill Nye: 'We need carbon tax to redistribute wealth...need gov't to run things...everyone else should shut up'

Activist Post

Bill Nye The Science Guy gave a speech showing him to be the latest cheerleader for authoritarians.

The final moments of the 'climate change' awareness speech to promote his new book were captured on the video below. There's no description in the video of where the event took place, but it seems to be from the National Science Teachers Conference earlier this month.

Some of the featured quotes he said to roaring cheers, "we need carbon tax to redistribute wealth...we need government to run things...everyone else should shut up" .



This may seem shocking to some (especially the cheering part), but Bill Nye has also recently called for heavy population reduction in line with eugenicists' "solution" to alleged climate change.

"Climate March" Hides Real Culprits and Real Solutions

Climate march is silly at best - dangerously counterproductive at worst.  

Tony Cartalucci

Big business and the big political parties and politicians they own have converged in what is being disingenuously called the "People's Climate March."  MSNBC would report in an article titled, "The largest climate march in history kicks off in New York," that:

They’re calling it the largest mobilization against climate change in the history of the planet. On Sunday morning, protesters from all over the United States and the world are converging on Manhattan to demand that global leaders take action to avert catastrophic climate change. Earlier this week Bill McKibben, founder of the environmental group 350.org, projected that the march would consist of “hundreds of thousands” of participants.

Not surprisingly little in terms of actual solutions are mentioned by the organizers and instead the march is meant to set the stage for political and financial deals to be made at the 2015 Climate Change Conference in Paris, France. Organizing the march are institutions funded by the very governments and corporate-financier special interests that have helped create devastating environmental and socioeconomic disasters across the planet over the past several decades in the first place.

UN climate change: 1000 scientists say no

image source

Jon Rappoport

Read it. 

It’s a shocking 321-page report assembled by The Climate Depot: 

“More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims.” 

It names names. It lists reasons for the dissent. 

Reality is engineered consensus. But when that doesn’t work, “experts” just assert there is a consensus when there isn’t. 

“What the hell, let’s just say that ‘everybody agrees’ manmade warming is destroying Earth and we have ten minutes to solve it, and let’s get our friends in the press to shut out the naysayers. You know, media blackout.” 

Science is supposed to be about evidence and proof, not consensus. But that idea is now laughed out of court. Science is about PR and who sits on the important thrones. 

Latest Study into the Possibility of Megadroughts Ignores Much of the Real Science of Climate Change

Chris Carrington

A new study in the Journal of Climate Science warns that decades-long drought may become the norm for the Southwestern United States.

“A drier Southwest is also a Southwest at risk of a megadrought,” said study author Toby Ault, a climate scientist at Cornell University.

Of course, the study implicates global warming as the cause of these future droughts; it does not take into account the planet hasn’t actually warmed at all since 1998.

EU Nanny State to Ban Toasters, Kettles & Hair Dryers!

Paul Joseph Watson

Visit Infowars.com

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.
Subscribe to GLOBAL POLITICAL AWAKENING by Email

Obama Set to Sign UN Climate Change Agreement WITHOUT Congress

Melissa Melton

The New York Times is reporting that the Obama administration is working behind the scenes to “forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions,” without seeking approval from Congress whatsoever:

In preparation for this agreement, to be signed at a United Nations summitmeeting in 2015 in Paris, the negotiators are meeting with diplomats from other countries to broker a deal to commit some of the world’s largest economies to enact laws to reduce their carbon pollution. But under the Constitution, a president may enter into a legally binding treaty only if it is approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.

To sidestep that requirement, President Obama’s climate negotiators are devising what they call a “politically binding” deal that would “name and shame” countries into cutting their emissions. The deal is likely to face strong objections from Republicans on Capitol Hill and from poor countries around the world, but negotiators say it may be the only realistic path. [emphasis added]

Notice the statement didn’t say climate change “rules” to be enacted, but “laws” to reduce carbon pollution.

Neil Young: Chemical Factory Farming Threatens the "Garden of the World"

Heather Callaghan

While people have been torn over beloved astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson's recent comments on genetically modified organisms, another beloved Neil took a stand - largely unnoticed.

While Tyson claims he never took a side, he still holds that genetic engineering is no different than what we've been doing for tens of thousands of years. One gets the impression from his view that corporatism and science become one for survival - despite negative consequences - and anyone who objects can go back to...being backward? Neil Young took an entirely different point-of-view, putting himself in the boots of that oft-forgotten group that gets left holding the bag in this mix: the farmer! Did his speech inspire them? Not at first...

Did he really suggest that Monsanto, the chemical conglomerates, industrialists and the big bankers are responsible for...? His argument below is unique, to say the least.

Who Are The Deniers Now? Record Ice Growth in 2013

Arctic ice grows 60% over last year
NASA image

Activist Post

Global warming skeptics have been repeatedly and viciously attacked by condescending "experts" and their fan clubs as deniers, flat-earth Neanderthals, oil-industry cronies, anti-environment cretins, and generally uninformed idiots. 

When did it become wrong to question the "official" version of climate change? Like the establishment hasn't lied to us in the past.

Significant evidence has recently come to light that should make all warmists pause and consider that they may have been duped by banksters champing at the bit to tax the air and control our lifestyles.

NASA released a recent image of the Arctic ice cap that shows record ice growth over last year:

Comparison compiled by DailyMail.co.uk

DailyMail reports that the 60% increase or 920,000 square miles of new ice has forced the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was forced to make urgent changes to their annual climate report.

Carbon Fraud Deniers

Dees Ilustration

Jon David Miller

Those who try to expose the falsehood of blaming carbon dioxide emissions from common human activities as the cause of climate change, are commonly dismissed as “climate change deniers”. If you are under that misconception, you should dig deeper to understand what is really happening, rather than accepting conclusions from false data and assuming the fraud alerts are just “conspiracy theory”.

I urge you not to ignore what I present because I am not a scientist. Rather, please discover that even scientists do not agree on this, and that this confusion is by design. Faulty science is made to seem correct when endorsed by political and bureaucratic officials for their own reasons. Don’t let the fraudsters bamboozle you into being a “carbon fraud denier”.

The idea of pinning natural climate differentials on humans generating carbon was developed by the elitist organization, The Club of Rome beginning in the 1970s. Gradually they arranged to have data manipulated (search "Climategate") to support a fraudulent propaganda campaign, which included the mistaken conclusions in Al Gore’s presentation, An Inconvenient Truth.

The purpose of this carbon fraud misdirection has been to serve the energy industry in justifying higher prices for fuels, while at the same time introducing carbon taxes, creating a new market for carbon credits, rolling out the “environmental/sustainability/smart growth” industry and having leverage for programs of population reduction and control under Agenda 21 of the United Nations.

United Nations Agenocide 21

Steven Stelmach, Jr.

While the full 'reach' of the UN Agenda 21 octopus is increasingly evident in the many sucking tentacles of the Green movement, intertwining themselves throughout every facet of our lives, that 'reach' is just to feed the awful, snapping, culling beak. Those thrashing arms are merely a means to carry the main message; A mere stroking method; A warm-up act; the nudge; the indoctrination; the siren song lulling us to accept the ultimate problem to the only solution to save the Earth. The true message of Agenda 21 is a much more ominous worldwide plan than those pervasive little half-measures being tried, like destroying private land ownership, rationing resources, equitable re-distribution of wealth, achieving social justice and rewilding the globe.

So what is that ultimate problem? UN scientists, the International Panel on Climate Change, NASA, and countless others have declared a global emergency...terminal Climate Change causedby humans. That decision is final and elites are working on the solution. The ultimate problem is officially declared as over-population. The vehicle to solve it is Agenda 21.

When Did Truth Become a Conspiracy Theory?

Joseph Ephraim

In the 1997 film, Conspiracy Theory, Jerry Fletcher says, "A good conspiracy theory is unprovable. I mean if you can prove it, it means they screwed up somewhere along the line." In other words, sometimes conspiracy theories are true, such as Agenda 21.

"UN Agenda 21 is a worldwide action plan to implement 'sustainable development.'" Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask and founder of Democrats Against Agenda 21, describes it well:

Agenda 21 is a global plan to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. Inventory and control.[i]

On February 13, 2013, the EPA issued a news release, "EPA Invites Communities to Apply for Smart Growth Assistance." According to the first paragraph:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today is inviting applications from communities interested in exploring barriers to smart growth and testing innovative strategies that can create healthier, more sustainable places to live, work, and play.[ii]

How could anyone be against smart growth? EPA is offering funding to communities to create new strategies that will overcome the public's resistance to Agenda 21…er Smart Growth to create environments that are more livable for everyone. It is for the good of all which leaves no space for anyone to disagree with its implementation.

Arrogant Obama Insults Skeptics: “We don’t have time for a meeting of the flat-Earth society”

Daisy Luther

You’re in estimable and well-educated company if you don’t believe in the myth of global warming. However, according to Obama, those who doubt the climate change propaganda are members of the “Flat Earth Society” – basically, superstitious fools.

Ironically, Obama is the one using junk science and emotion in order to further an agenda, because man-made climate change is a myth that has been disproved.

Global warming has been debunked by peer-reviewed studies. A recent article by Thomas Lifson for American Thinker stated “A peer-reviewed survey of 1077 geoscientists and engineers finds that “only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis.

What’s more, researchers at none other than NASA have confirmed that carbon dioxide actually cools the planet, rather than warming it.

Our World is Changing: Looking Beyond 'the 2012'

Youtube

Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Be the Change! Share this using the tools below. Sharing on Reddit and Newsvine will help the most.

Migrating North Pole Contributing to Severe Weather?

Activist Post

Few can argue that severe weather is currently impacting the globe. Certainly the record droughts in America have become a huge concern for food prices, which has subsequently sparked an uptick in alarming climate change rhetoric.

As the Northern Hemisphere has experienced one of the warmest summers on record, Arctic ice has receded considerably, prompting the typical global warming "collapse" discussion. While northern ice has indeed reached new modern lows, ice in the southern hemisphere continent of Antarctica has reached record highs. Charts for both hemispheres can be seen here.

So, clearly some kind of shift is happening, but perhaps the answer is not as simple as CO2 concentrations like the establishment would like us to believe. There seem to be much larger galactic-scale forces at play that are affecting not just Earth but all planets in the solar system. One of those forces appears to be Earth's rapidly migrating magnetic North Pole, as can be seen in the video below. 

False Data Justifies Spraying Sulfuric Aerosols to Save the Arctic Ice-Sheets

Susanne Posel, Contributor

Under the Arctic ice-sheets are supposed more than 400 billion metric tons of carbon that is assumed to slowly seep out with methane as the effects of global warming continue. The permafrost of the Antarctic has nearly the same amount stored in the frozen soil.

Methane is 25 times more potent than CO2 and would have drastic effects on the temperature of the earth, say alarmists like Jemma Wadham, professor of Glaciology at the U.K.’s University of Bristol.

There’s a potentially large pool of methane hydrate in part of the Earth where we haven’t previously considered it. 

Depending on where that hydrate is, and how much there is, if the ice thins in those regions, some of that hydrate could come out with a possible feedback on climate.

The latest insinuation in alarmist circles is that methane is affecting the temperature of the earth through carbon dioxide emissions. Regardless of the scientific data refuting CO2 as a defining factor in the planet’s natural cycle of rising and lowering temperature, this new ploy appears to have more punch than just blaming CO2 alone.

Experts Claim Carbon Taxes Will Save Thousands of Lives

Andrew Puhanic, Contributor
Activist Post

Carbon taxes are now being heralded as a new way to save thousands of lives, and as a means of reducing government spending on health care in the falsified war on climate change.

A report published by the Climate and Health Alliance and the Climate Institute in Australia titled, "Health Benefits of Emissions Reductions" has concluded that the Australian government could save billions of dollars from its health care budget and save thousands of lives each year because of the carbon tax.

The carbon tax is also being used as a catalyst to address claims such as coal-fired power plants are causing lethal diseases and that pollution caused by cars is affecting everyone's quality of life.

Colonizing Nations 101

Stephen Lendman, Contributor
Activist Post

Last December, Truth 11.com offered a model for destroying and colonizing nations. In Orwellian newspeak, it said:

1. Global "Mafia" scoundrels target nations "ripe for 'Regime Change.' " Calling them rogue states enlists support.
2. CIA/Mossad/MI6 and collaborators "arm, train, (and) finance local and foreign mercenaries/terrorists." Freedom fighters they're called for the same reason.
3. With or without Security Council authorization, mass killing and destruction follow. At the same time, sanctions suffocate nations economically. Political isolation harms them further. Civilians always suffer most.
4. Media propaganda glorifies war in the name of peace. Managed news enlists public support. Mind manipulation convinces people to back what they should condemn.
5. Invasions and occupations are called liberation. Plunder is called economic development. Exploitation and imperial control are called democracy.

Might justifies right. Nations are destroyed to free them. Code language conceals real motives. Policy involves ravaging the world one country at a time or in multiples. Nations are destroyed for their own good. Monied interests alone benefit.

Climate Change: Is the Carbon Tax the Death of Democracy?

Dees Illustration

Kate Johnston, Contributor
Activist Post

On July 1st 2012, Australia joined nations around the world in their move towards a carbon economy through the implementation of a Carbon Tax, which will become an Emissions Trading Scheme in 2015. Yet the underpinning justification for this move, the science behind man-made global warming, is not even close to being settled. In fact, an increasingly large body of scientists and researchers are telling us the exact opposite of what the United Nations and governments around the world would have us believe.

It is now evident that the science behind man-made global warming that dictates government policy is false, manipulated and corrupt and exists solely to meet a pre-determined political agenda whilst attempting to pass it off as credible science.

Central to this article is the role of the United Nations. Their treaties, summits and bodies have been responsible for providing the framework and political will that has moved the ‘environmental movement’ to where it is today.

This article seeks to go into more depth into current day science, which overwhelmingly suggests that global warming is not caused by human Carbon Dioxide emissions. Furthermore, I will outline the role of key players on the international stage that have worked tirelessly to convince us otherwise.

Finally, I will begin to look in more depth at what the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is and where it actually originated. As the article progresses it will become clearer that the Carbon Tax and Emissions Trading Scheme do absolutely nothing for the environment. Given this is the pretext used by governments for introducing carbon economy, I will attempt to convey some deeper social, political and economic influences at work here. In doing so, I hope to assist in understanding the reasons why we are moving towards a carbon economy and how this global movement abolishes our inalienable rights as human beings and basic freedoms – most of which many of us take for granted.

Empirical Scientific Data Continues to Discredit Climate Change Alarmists

Susanne Posel, Contributor
Activist Post

Based on a new mathematical reconfiguration of the false claims that CO2 is affecting the earth’s temperature, a call for a “carbon deinvestment campaign” has been made.

By making carbon taxes a global and integral part of the “fee-and-dividend approach”, these climate change alarmists want to redistribute wealth from country to country as the globalists at the UN have outlined in various eco-terrorist manifestos.

However, real scientific data from real-world observations, and not the IPCC’s falsified computer model projections, are painting a different picture of what is actually happening with our weather and what the true effects of climate change actually are.

Anthony Watts, former television meteorologist, has conducted a study into the reliability of weather stations in the US Historical Climatology Network. According to Watts’ analysis of the position of the weather stations and their spoiling of assumed empirical data, results show the planet warming at just 0.155 degrees Celsius per decade, rather than the 0.309 C per decade cited by the government.

Watts believes that the reality of global warming is that it is not as “catastrophic, or as bad as it’s been portrayed.”