Mr. Snowden’s claim that he is focussed on supporting transparency, freedom of the press, and protection of individual rights and democracy is belied by the protectors he has potentially chosen: China, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, and Ecuador.
His failure to criticize these regimes suggests that his true motive throughout has been to injure the national security of the US, not to advance Internet freedom and free speech.
I think what we have in Edward Snowden is just a narcissistic young man who has decided he is smarter than the rest of us.
(W)hat Snowden exposed was not some rogue government-inside-the-government conspiracy. It's a program that's legal, reviewed by Congress and subject to court oversight.
For society to function well, there have to be basic levels of trust and cooperation, a respect for institutions and deference to common procedures. By deciding to unilaterally leak secret NSA documents, Snowden has betrayed all of these things.He betrayed the cause of open government. Every time there is a leak like this, the powers that be close the circle of trust a little tighter. They limit debate a little more.
He betrayed the privacy of us all. If federal security agencies can’t do vast data sweeps, they will inevitably revert to the older, more intrusive eavesdropping methods.He betrayed the Constitution. The founders did not create the United States so that some solitary 29-year-old could make unilateral decisions about what should be exposed.Snowden self-indulgently short-circuited the democratic structures of accountability, putting his own preferences above everything else.
Interviewer: Not everybody thinks Edward Snowden did the right thing. I presume you do.Drake: I consider Edward Snowden as a whistleblower. I know some have called him a hero, some have called him a traitor. I focus on what he disclosed.I don't focus on him as a person. He had a belief that what he was exposed to - US actions in secret - were violating human rights and privacy on a very, very large scale, far beyond anything that had been admitted to date by the government. In the public interest, he made that available.Interviewer: What do you say to the argument, advanced by those with the opposite viewpoint to you, especially in the US Congress and the White House, that Edward Snowden is a traitor who made a narcissistic decision that he personally had a right to decide what public information should be in the public domain.Drake: That's a government meme, a government cover. That’s a government story. The government is desperate to not deal with the actual exposures, the content of the disclosures.Because they do reveal a vast, systemic, institutionalized, industrial-scale Leviathan surveillance state that has clearly gone far beyond the original mandate to deal with terrorism - far beyond.
I believe that at this point in history, the greatest danger to our freedom and way of life comes from the reasonable fear of omniscient State powers kept in check by nothing more than policy documents.The government has granted itself power it is not entitled to. There is no public oversight....I can't in good conscience allow the US government to destroy privacy, internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this massive surveillance machine they're secretly building.Allowing the US government to intimidate its people with threats of retaliation for revealing wrongdoing is contrary to the public interest.I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under.I don't want to live in a world where there's no privacy, and therefore no room for intellectual exploration and creativity.