Rockefeller Foundation Conceptualized “Anti-Hormone” Vaccine in the 1920s and 30s, Reports Reveal

Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars.com
September 10, 2010

Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason, who acted as president in the mid-1930s, on multiple occasions expressed his master’s desire for an “anti-hormone” that would reduce fertility worldwide. Now keep in mind, this is more than 35 years before the Foundation actually mentioned funding “anti-fertility vaccines” in subsequent annual reports from 1969 onward.

Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason.

Having traveled far beyond the realm of rumor and speculation, research into the admitted funding of anti-fertility vaccines has uncovered more and more sinister revelations along the way.

By the mid-1930s, Mason of the Rockefeller Foundation thought that “the ultimate solution of the problem [of birth control] may well lie in the studies of endocrinology, particularly antihormones.” The Foundation’s 1934 annual report states:

“The Rockefeller Foundation has decided to concentrate its present effort in the natural sciences on the field of modern experimental biology, with special interest in such topics as endocrinology, nutrition, genetics, embryology, problems centering about the reproductive process, psychobiology, general and cellular physiology, biophysics, and biochemistry.”

“(…) research work is being conducted on the physiology of reproduction in the monkey. This work was begun at the Johns Hopkins University in 1921, and since 1923 has been continued at the University of Rochester. It involves observational and experimental studies of the reproductive cycle in certain species of the higher primates, in which this cycle closely resembles that of the human species. The effect of the various interrelated reproductive hormones is being studied.”

In the annual report of the previous year (1933), the Foundation stresses the fact that work on the reproductive hormones of primates serves to experiment on man in the future:

“(…) much work has been done in the formulation and solution of basic problems in the general biology and physiology of sex in organisms other than man. It was essential that this fundamental work on infra-man pave the way for that on man.”

In the book Discipling Reproduction by Adele E. Clarke, the roots of Rockefeller-funded “anti-hormones” is being described in some detail, pointing out that the family’s ambitions to control man’s fertility date back even further than the 1930s. Clarke writes:

“On a cold morning in 1921, George Washington Corner, a physician and fledgling reproductive scientist, awoke in Baltimore to discover that it was snowing.”

“By 1929”, Clarke writes a bit further on, “Corner had mapped out the hormonal action of progesterone, an essential actor in the menstrual cycle and subsequently an actor in birth control pills.”

The 1935 Rockefeller Foundation annual report acknowledges funding Dr. Corner’s research:

“To the University of Rochester, for research on the physiology of reproduction under the direction of Dr. G. W. Corner during the threeyear period beginning July 1, 1935, and ending June 30, 1938, there has been appropriated the sum of $9,900. Dr. Corner’s activities are concentrated on a study of the oestrus cycle, using monkeys as the experimental animals. A colony of about thirty monkeys has been maintained, and experiments have furnished information on the normal histology of the reproductive cycle, the time of ovulation, the relation of ovulation to menstruation and other anatomically detectable correlations of the oestrus cycle. Work is continuing on two main lines: normal sex reproduction in the monkey, including the histology of ovary and uterus, and, secondly, the effects of the ovarian hormone.”

Again, never forget that the Foundation in 1933 stated outright that “It was essential that this fundamental work on infra-man pave the way for that on man.”

Another essential problem which arises, of course, is how exactly the funding-mechanism worked by which Corner’s research could be made ready for mass-consumption. Clarke mentions that officially the National Research Council, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), was the institute responsible for the task of doing so. More specific: the Committee for Research in Problems of Sex (CRPS):

“The NRC itself was founded in 1916 as an agency to inventory research toward enhanced military preparedness.”

“The NRC”, states the author, “was a prestigious organization from its inception, thanks to its early association with the NAS, the Carnegie Corporation, and the Rockefeller Foundation. Kohler (1991:109) has argued that the NRC essentially served as an intermediary between the foundations and scientists in the interwar years.(…). The NRC/CRPS itself was funded almost exclusively by Rockefeller monies, initially through the Bureau of Social Hygiene and, after 1931, through the Rockefeller Foundation.”

On the subject of so-called “current immunological contraceptive research”, Clarke channels Rockefeller-president Max Mason:

“Other lines of current immunological contraceptive research continue to seek what, during the 1930s, Max Mason of the Rockefeller Foundation called “anti-hormones”: vaccines to block hormones needed for very early pregnancy and a vaccine to block the hormone needed for the surface of the egg to function properly.”

In a February 1934 “progress report” written by Warren Weaver (director of the Natural Sciences Division of the Rockefeller Foundation) once again underlined the endgame:

“Can man gain an intelligent control of his own power? Can we develop so sound and extensive a genetics that we can hope to breed, in the future, superior men? Can we obtain enough knowledge of physiology and psychobiology of sex so that man can bring this pervasive, highly important, and dangerous aspect of life under rational control?”

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

The same Warren Weaver wrote a “biographical Memoir” in honor of his friend Max Mason, revealing some more interesting facts. Weaver, who describes himself as a great personal friend of Mason, gives a general description of him as Rockefeller-minion:

“He had by that time developed a consuming interest in behavioral research, and particularly in the possibility that the physical sciences, working with and through the biological sciences, could shed new and revealing light on the normal and abnormal behavior of individuals, and ultimately on the social behavior of groups of men.”

Here we have it. The blueprint for sterilizing vaccines has been first conceptualized way back in the 1920s and 1930s by social scientists of the Rockefeller Foundation. Although later the eugenic language (“anti-fertility vaccine”) was polished up with the help of some linguistic plastic surgery producing the term “immunological contraceptive”, the ultimate goal remains the same.

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print Page 

Conclusive: Global Distribution of Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO

Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars.com
August 27, 2010

In addition to the recent PrisonPlanet-exclusive Rockefeller Foundation Developed Vaccines For “Mass-Scale” Fertility Reduction — which outlines the Rockefeller Foundation’s efforts in the 1960s funding research into so-called “anti-fertility vaccines”– another series of documents has surfaced, proving beyond any doubt that the UN Population Fund, World Bank and World Health Organization picked up on it, further developing it under responsibility of a “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation”.

	WHO and the Rockefeller Foundation have worked together on “anti-fertility” vaccine since the 1960s.

Just four years after the Rockefeller Foundation launched massive funding-operations into anti-fertility vaccines, the Task Force was created under auspices of the World Health Organization, World Bank and UN Population Fund. Its mission,according to one of its members, to support:

“basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against thegametes or the preimplantation embryo. These studies have involved the use of advanced procedures in peptide chemistry, hybridoma technology and molecular genetics as well as the evaluation of a number of novel approaches in general vaccinology. As a result of this international, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.”

In regards to the scope of the Task Force’s jurisdiction, the Biotechnology and Development Monitor reported:

“The Task Force acts as a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D in the various working groups and supports research on different approaches, such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG. The Task Force has succeeded in developing a prototype of an anti-hCG-vaccine.”

One of the Task Force members, P.D. Griffin, outlined the purpose and trajectory of these Fertility Regulating Vaccines. Griffin:

“The Task Force has continued to coordinate its research activities with other vaccine development programmes within WHO and with other international and national programmes engaged in the development of fertility regulating vaccines.”

Griffin also admitted to the fact that one of the purposes of the vaccines is the implementation in developing countries. Griffin:

“If vaccines could be developed which could safely and effectively inhibit fertility, without producing unacceptable side effects, they would be an attractive addition to the present armamentarium of fertility regulating methods and would be likely to have a significant impact on family planning programmes.”

Also, one of the advantages of the FRVs over “currently available methods of fertility regulation” the Task Force states, is the following (179):

“low manufacturing cost and ease of delivery within existing health services.”

Already in 1978, the WHO’s Task Force (then called Task Force on Immunological Methods for Fertility Regulation) underlined the usefulness of these vaccines in regards to the possibility of “large scale synthesis and manufacture” of the vaccine:

“The potential advantages of an immunological approach to fertility regulation can be summarized as follows: (a) the possibility of infrequent administration, possibly by paramedical personnel; (b) the use of antigens or antigen fragments, which are not pharmacologically active; and (c) in the case of antigens of known chemical structure, there is the possibility of large-scale synthesis and manufacture of vaccine at relatively low cost.”

In 1976, the WHO Expanded Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction published a report, stating:

“In 1972 the Organization (…) expanded its programme of research in human reproduction to provide an international focus for an intensified effort to improve existing methods of fertility regulation, to develop new methods and to assist national authorities in devising the best ways of providing them on a continuing basis. The programme is closely integrated with other WHO research on the delivery of family planning care by health services, which in turn feeds into WHO’s technical assistance programme to governments at the service level.”

Although the term “Anti-Fertility Vaccine”, coined by the Rockefeller Foundation, was replaced by the more bureaucratic sounding “Fertility Regulating Vaccine (FRV), the programme was obviously the same. Besides, The time line shows conclusively that the WHO, UN Population Fund and World Bank continued on a path outlined by the Rockefellers in the late 1960s. By extensions, it proves that all these organization are perfectly interlocked, best captured under the header “Scientific Dictatorship”. The relationshipbetween the WHO and the Rockefeller Foundation is intense. In the 1986 bulletin of the World Health Organization, this relationship is being described in some detail. While researching the effectiveness of “gossypol” as an “antifertility agent”, the bulletin states:

“The Rockefeller Foundation has supported limited clinical trials in China and smallscale clinical studies in Brazil and Austria. The dose administered in the current Chinese trial has been reduced from 20 mg to 10-15 mg/day during the loading phase in order to see if severe oligospermia rather than consistent azoospermia would be adequate for an acceptable, non-toxic and reversible effect. Meanwhile, both the WHO human reproduction programme and the Rockefeller Foundation are supporting animal studies to better define the mechanism of action of gossypol.”

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

In August of 1992, a series of meetings was held in Geneva, Switzerland, regarding “fertility regulating vaccines”. According to the document Fertility Regulating Vaccines (classified by the WHO with a limited distribution) present at those meetings were scientists and clinicians from all over the globe, including then biomedical researcher of the American Agency for International development, and current research-chief of USAID, Mr. Jeff Spieler.

In 1986 Mr. Spieler declared:

“A new approach to fertility regulation is the development of vaccines directed against human substances required for reproduction. Potential candidates for immunological interference include reproductive hormones, ovum and sperm antigens, and antigens derived from embryonic or fetal tissue.(…). An antifertility vaccine must be capable of safely and effectively inhibiting a human substance, which would need somehow to be rendered antigenic. A fertility-regulating vaccine, moreover, would have to produce and sustain effective immunity in at least 95% of the vaccinated population, a level of protection rarely achieved even with the most successful viral and bacterial vaccines. But while these challenges looked insuperable just a few years ago, recent advances in biotechnology- particularly in the fields of molecular biology, genetic engineering and monoclonal antibody production- are bringing antifertility vaccines into the realm of the feasible.”

“Vaccines interfering with sperm function and fertilization could be available for human testing by the early 1990s”, Spieler wrote.

In order for widespread use of these vaccines, Spieler writes, the vaccine must conquer “variations in individual responses to immunization with fertility-regulating vaccines”.

“Research”, he goes on to say,”is also needed in the field of “basic vaccinology”, to find the best carrier proteins, adjuvants, vehicles and delivery systems.”

In the 1992 document, the problem of “variations in individual responses” is also discussed:

“Because of the genetic diversity of human populations”, states the document, “immune responses to vaccines often show marked differences from one individual to another in terms of magnitude and duration. These differences may be partly or even completely overcome with appropriately engineered FRVs (Fertility Regulating Vaccines) and by improvements in our understanding of what is required to develop and control the immune response elicited by different vaccines.”

The picture emerging from these facts is clear. The WHO, as a global coordinating body, has since the early 70s continued the development of the Rockefeller-funded “anti-fertility vaccine”. What also is becoming clear, is that extensive research has been done to the delivery systems in which these anti-fertility components can be buried, such as regular anti-viral vaccines. It’s a mass-scale anti-fertilization programme with the aim of reducing the world’s population: a dream long cherished by the global elite.

Toxic chemicals finding their way into the womb - CNN.com

by Mark Daniels


"Toxic Childhood" with Dr.Sanjay Gupta, aired last night on CNN.  According to the "experts" he interviewed, they are finding increased levels of dangerous chemicals, such as Mercury in pregnant women, infants, and children.


In a related article, Toxic chemicals finding their way into the womb - CNN.com, Stephanie Smith, CNN Medical Producer, begins by promoting Dr. Gupta's "Toxic Childhood", before talking about a young couple who had a series of miscarriages.

"Five years ago Molly and Zachery Gray were in the midst of a dark, lonely spiral. It began with Molly's first miscarriage.

"It was a really emotional process of being so joyful and so happy and ready to make that step into parenthood and that being pulled away from you," said Molly, 32. "[The pregnancy is] happening and all of a sudden it's gone. It's really hard."

After a second miscarriage the Grays were on a desperate hunt for answers. After Molly got pregnant a third time, she heard about a small study to test the blood of pregnant women for chemicals. She signed up."

Despite her best efforts to avoid anything unhealthy while she was pregnant with her son, Molly's blood tested high for mercury, a heavy metal (emphasis added) that can cause brain damage to a developing fetus.

She continues by blaming the miscarriages on environmental pollution and household chemicals.  She never mentions even the remote possibility of contaminated vaccines.

James Gillray, The Cow-Pock—or—the
Wonderful Effects of the New noculation!(1802)

According to the CDC:

Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative used in some vaccines and other products since the 1930's. There is no convincing evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thimerosal in vaccines, except for minor reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site. However, in July 1999, the Public Health Service agencies, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and vaccine manufacturers agreed that thimerosal should be reduced or eliminated in vaccines as a precautionary measure.

The "experts" interviewed by Dr. Gupta, seem to agree that a serious problem exists, but they do not agree that the chemicals found, with increasing levels, in the population, are causing "ill health".

One expert believes that the "polluted" environment is the cause of the increased levels of chemical, but he admitted that the science has yet to prove a clear connection between these chemicals and "ill health".

The "experts" do agree that the population is experiencing a dramatic increase in "ill health",i.e. autism, etc.  Another "expert" stated "there is no causal link between the chemicals and ill health".  The other expert accused her of receiving "support" from the chemical industry.  She did not deny that she receives "some" support from the chemical industry.

It is truly alarming when we can't trust the so called "experts" who are presented to us in the "Mainstream Media" as the authority on issues of health; life and death issues.

I also found it disconcerting that the only mention of Vaccines was to promote their effectiveness in combating illness when scientific research has clearly shown significant health risks associated with most vaccines.

Dr. Gupta has been maligned in the alternative media for joining with the ex-First Lady Laura Bush to shill for vaccines. Pam Martens of Counterpunch.org, in a 2007 article, CNN's Sanjay Gupta, Laura Bush and the Marketing of Merck's Gardasil, she states:

Writing on his CNN blog on February 28, 2007, Dr. Gupta endorsed Merck's controversial and scientifically challenged vaccine for girls and young women, Gardasil, without shedding any light on the incestuous relationship he has with Merck.
"As a doctor, and parent, I would recommend the vaccine for my daughters. I feel the ability to protect them in any way, including from cancer, is my primary obligation." (1) 

Well, apparently, there is nothing some people won't do for money.  If you study the Eugenics movement, you will find that the so called "expert" scientists, physicians, and researchers were all involved in the mass extermination of the Jews in Nazi Germany, the  indigenous people of Canada (Canadian Holocaust), Australia. etc.

Why do we think that we are immune from the Eugenicists? Genocide? Population control?  Do you think the former victims knew they were being murdered?  As a matter of fact, many Jewish family's went to the camps believing that they would be provided work, food, shelter, and yes, you guessed it, "health care"!

What we must understand is that the Eugenicists begin with "soft kill" techniques presented to a naive population in a palatable form such as "HEALTH CARE REFORM", giving the government increased control over vaccinations, etc, They introduce poison into our water and food supply (fluoride, lithium, etc).   The list goes on ad infinitum.

Don't misunderstand.  I do not know if Dr. Sanjay Gupta is a part of a conspiracy to kill off the "bottom feeders" or others.  What I do know is that the Mainstream Media does not present the truth to the public.

I also know that history has proven that Eugenicists have used their methods to exert control over the population (sterilization, culling, etc)  These people believe that the world is over populated (currently apx. 6.8 billion).  They want to decrease the population to a manageable size (apx. 500 million-1 billion).

So you may wonder who funds these evil conspiracies?  According to Jurriaan Maessen's article:

In its 1968 yearly report, the Rockefeller Foundation acknowledged funding the development of so-called “anti-fertility vaccines” and their implementation on a mass-scale. From page 51 onward we read:

“(…) several types of drugs are known to diminish male fertility, but those that have been tested have serious problems of toxicity. Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.”

The possibility of using vaccines to reduce male fertility was something that needed to be investigated further, according to the Rockefeller Foundation, because both the oral pill and the IUD were not suitable for mass-scale distribution:

“We are faced with the danger that within a few years these two “modern” methods, for which such high hopes have been held, will in fact turn out to be impracticable on a mass scale.”

The possibility of administrating hormone preparations to reduce fertility was also mentioned, although- states the report- they have been known to “cause bleeding problems, which may limit their usefulness.”

“A semi permanent or renewable subcutaneous implant of these hormones has been suggested, but whether or not the same difficulties would result has not been determined.”

Saying that research thus-far had been too low-grade to produce any substantial results, the report was adamant:

“The Foundation will endeavour to assist in filling this important gap in several ways:

1- “Seeking out or encouraging the development of, and providing partial support to, a few centres of excellence in universities and research institutions in the United States and abroad in which the methods and points of view of molecular biology are teamed with the more traditional approaches of histology, embryology,and endocrinology in research pertinent to development of fertility control methods;”

2- “Supporting research of individual investigators, oriented toward development of contraceptive methods or of basic information on human reproduction relevant to such developments;”

3- “Encouraging, by making research funds available, as well as by other means, established and beginning investigators to turn their attention to aspects of research in reproductive biology that have implications for human fertility and its control;”

4- “Encouraging more biology and biochemistry students to elect careers in reproductive biology and human fertility control, through support of research and teaching programs in departments of zoology, biology, and biochemistry.”

The list goes on and on. Motivation for these activities, according to the RF? 

READ FULL ARTICLE 

Please check out the list of resources below.  I realize that the sheer volume of information available to process can be rather overwhelming.  I suggest that you carefully select from the available resources; it is imperative that we take the time to educate ourselves about these complex issues.  It is the only way we can fight back against these evil people

It is time to Wake Up!  You too, can join the Global Political Awakening!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RESOURCES:
VACCINE AND EUGENICS:

Evidence of Harm: Mercury in Vaccines and the Autism Epidemic: A Medical Controversy

In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity

The Vaccine Guide: Risks and Benefits for Children and Adults

The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism

Saying No to Vaccines

Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement

What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Children's Vaccinations

War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race

The Virus and the Vaccine: Contaminated Vaccine, Deadly Cancers, and Government Neglect

Eugenics and Other Evils : An Argument Against the Scientifically Organized State

Raising A Vaccine Free Child

Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell

Shoot 'Em Up - The Truth About Vaccines, 2 DVD Special Edition

Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America (American Crossroads)

What The Pharmaceutical Companies Don't Want You To Know About VACCINES...

In Reckless Hands: Skinner v. Oklahoma and the Near-Triumph of American Eugenics

Autism's False Prophets: Bad Science, Risky Medicine, and the Search for a Cure

From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany

Evidence of Harm: Mercury in Vaccines and the Autism Epidemic: A Medical Controversy

Eugenics: A Reassessment (Human Evolution, Behavior, and Intelligence)

A Stand Against Tyranny: Norway's Physicians and the Nazis

Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant

The Tyranny of Health: Doctors and the Regulation of Lifestyle

Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy: The Control of Female Fertility

Tyranny of the Normal: Essays on Bioethics, Theology & Myth

The Unfit: A History of a Bad Idea

Dark Medicine: Rationalizing Unethical Medical Research (Bioethics and the Humanities)

The Eugenics Movement: An Encyclopedia

Informed Consent

Preaching Eugenics: Religious Leaders and the American Eugenics Movement

Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the Baby Boom

Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America's Quest for Racial Purity

Sex, Race, and Science: Eugenics in the Deep South

Eugenics and Education in America: Institutionalized Racism and the Implications of History, Ideology, and Memory (Complicated Conversation: a Book Series of Curriculum Studies)

American Eugenics: Race, Queer Anatomy, and the Science of Nationalism

Eugenics And the Welfare State: Sterilization Policy in Demark, Sweden, Norway, and Findland (Uppsala Studies in History of Science)

Crying Hands: Eugenics and Deaf People in Nazi Germany

Controlled Repopulation (Eugenics Mix)

Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement

Keeping America Sane: Psychiatry and Eugenics in the United States and Canada, 1880-1940 (Cornell Studies in the History of Psychiatry)

Eugenics: Webster's Timeline History, 1822 - 2007

Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth - Second Edition, Revised and Updated

The Architecture of Doom [VHS]

There is no vaccine against stupidity Men's Tee Shirt 4XL-Black

Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth-Century Britain

Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines: The Truth Behind a Tragedy

Defiant Birth: Women Who Resist Medical Eugenics

The Academic Aspect of the Science of National Eugenics