Translate

GPA Store: Featured Products

Showing posts with label IAEA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IAEA. Show all posts

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Iran Lie Same as Iraq Lie


Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner
Be the Change! Share this using the tools below. Sharing on Reddit and Newsvine will help the most.

Thursday, June 2, 2011

IAEA Admits - 'There Is NO Safe Level Of Radiation'

The IAEA standards are not based on what is safe but how great the benefit, said CAP after a meeting with the panel.


Tashny Sukumaran
Free Malaysia Today

PUTRAJAYA: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) today admitted there is no such thing as “safe” levels of radiation.

However, it told the Consumer Association of Penang that some radiation levels could be justified.

The nine-member IAEA panel is here to gauge the safety of the Lynas rare earth refinery in Kuantan.

CAP vice-president Mohideen Abdul Kader told reporters after meeting the IAEA panel that they had agreed to carry out a cost-benefit analysis before allowing the plant to start operations.

Mohideen also said that the IAEA’s radiation standards were merely an “international consensus”  as studies had not found a safe level of radiation.

Read Full Article

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Monday, March 28, 2011

The Codex Alimentarius Irradiated Food Cover-up

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


Radura symbol - Wiki Image
Updated excerpt from  
Codex Alimentarius -- The End of Health Freedom

Brandon Turbeville

In the last article, I briefly discussed a proposal made by the FDA which was very similar to one made by Congress five years earlier. This proposal would have allowed production companies to use terms such as “electronically pasteurized” instead of “irradiated” and, going further, simply allow the food to be categorized as “pasteurized” with no indication whatsoever that the food had been subject to radiation.

The proposal made by the FDA in April, 2007 is an interesting one indeed. In the opening summary of the text, the FDA states that one of the purposes of the proposal is to make it so that “only those irradiated foods in which the irradiation causes a material change in the food, or a material change in the consequences that may result from the use of the food, bear the radura logo and the term ‘irradiation,’ or a derivative thereof, in conjunction with explicit language describing the change in the food or its conditions of use.”[1] 

While this may seem like a strengthening of a rule, in reality it is not. This proposal is merely another cover mechanism for the pretense of protecting the consumer with strong regulation, while allowing industry to do just what it wants, i.e. produce high levels of irradiated food to cover up unsanitary manufacturing practices.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Iran to Release Israel Nuke Documents

Iran's SNSC Saeed Jalili
Press TV

Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Saeed Jalili has questioned nuclear weapons of Israel, saying Iran will release documents on Tel Aviv's nuclear program.

"Based on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), proliferation of nuclear weapons should be prevented. There is a main question in the Muslim world that where the Zionist regime [of Israel] has obtained its nuclear weapons from," the IRIB quoted Jalili as saying on Monday.

"The Zionist regime and those who provided it with nuclear arms should answer this question," he added.

The Iranian official warned that the Islamic Republic would soon release documents showing how the US provided Israel with enriched nuclear materials and how the materials have been transferred to Israel.

Read Full Article

RELATED ARTICLE:
Is Iran Playing Geopolitical Chess with 9-11, and Winning?

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

Are you ready to evacuate?

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Iran Fires Up Nuclear Plant Despite Threats

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
August 22, 2010

Iran has begun to fuel its first nuclear power station in Bushehr despite a massive propaganda campaign launched against the reactor by the United States and Israel and largely ineffectual United Nations and U.S. Congress sanctions.
“‘It is totally unacceptable that a country that so blatantly violates resolutions of the (United Nations) Security Council, decisions of the International Atomic Energy Agency and its commitments under the NPT (non-proliferation treaty) should enjoy the fruits of using nuclear energy,” said Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yossi Levy. “The international community should increase pressure … to force Iran to abide by international decisions and cease its enrichment activities and its construction of reactors.”
Israel has not signed the NPT. On September 18, 2009 the General Conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency called on Israel to open its nuclear facilities to IAEA inspection and adhere to the non-proliferation treaty. The chief Israeli delegate stated that “Israel will not co-operate in any matter with this resolution.”
It is estimated that Israel has approximately 400 thermonuclear weapons.
“Russia’s support for Bushehr underscores that Iran does not need an indigenous enrichment capability if its intentions are purely peaceful,” U.S. State Department spokesman Darby Holladay told Reuters. Holladay said that oversight of the plant by the International Atomic Energy Agency “shouldn’t be confused with the world’s fundamental concerns with Iran’s overall nuclear intentions, particularly its pursuit of uranium enrichment.”
On Saturday, Antiwar Radio host Scott Horton told RT News that the Bushehr reactor will be incapable of producing nuclear weapons grade fuel:

Jasper Roberts Consulting - Widget