Translate

GPA Store: Featured Products

Showing posts with label GAY MARRIAGE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GAY MARRIAGE. Show all posts

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Faith in America non-profit confronts religion-based bigotry

The billboards sponsored by Faith in America.
by A. LATHAM STAPLES - SDGLN CONTRIBUTOR

At the first CNN/YouTube Presidential Primary Debate in Charleston, S.C., in 2007, the Rev. Reggie Longcrier, Faith in America supporter and pastor of Exodus Mission and Outreach Church in Hickory, N.C., asked then Democratic candidate John Edwards “Why is it still acceptable to use religion to deny gay Americans their full and equal rights?”

The question, following Edward’s statement of opposition to same-sex marriage in relation to his Southern Baptist background, drew the loudest applause of any question, according to audience members at the debate.

Mitchell Gold, who in 2005 founded Faith in America, a non-profit organization with the goal of counter-messaging prejudices toward the LGBT population by religious institutions, contends that “political and religious leaders have long sold discrimination under the guise of religious beliefs and religious teachings, and that religion-based bigotry is the number one impediment to full equality for lesbians and gays.”

Faith in America came about after Gold moved from New York to a very rural and socially conservative community in North Carolina in the late 1980s to form a large furniture company with over 700 employees.

“I soon realized that so many of the employees were good, decent, hardworking Americans, yet many of them harbored deeply rooted hostility toward homosexuals, with the moral and religious stamp of approval,” Gold said.

The widespread oppression that he observed in the lives of gay youths especially hit Gold hard and served as the catalyst to begin plans to combat discrimination by religious institutions.

With the help of Jimmy Creech, former chairman of the board of directors of Soulforce and a former Methodist minister who in 1999 was stripped of his ministerial orders by the Methodist Church after having blessed a gay union, and Brent Childers, a conservative evangelical Christian, Faith in America was formed to educate the public about religion-based bigotry’s harm to the LGBT community.

Childers, a former journalist and current Faith in America executive director, admits that he once “garnered hostility towards gays" and he had once been "a voice for the religious right.”

“I had publicly derided gays and lesbians under the banner of Christianity. Soon though, I realized the hostility wasn’t at the center of my Christian beliefs, it was being instilled in me by the church itself,” Childers said. “For centuries various leaders have used the Bible to preach slavery and segregation, to promote sexism, and to decry interracial marriage.
“The Bible has a divine place for the spiritual life of a person, but you can’t get past the fact that it was written by individuals and has gone through various translations and interpretations,” Childers said. “The teachings in it are a wonderful example of how one should lead their life but shouldn’t be taken literally.”

In 2006 Faith in America gained national attention after the organization disseminated a series of educational campaigns that stirred controversy in a number of communities across the nation. The newspaper ads, radio spots and billboards featured the image of Jesus Christ along with Biblical passages such as "Jesus affirmed a gay couple (Matthew 8:5-13)," "Jesus said some are born gay (Matthew 19:10-12)" and "The early church welcomed a gay man (Acts 8:26-40)."

According to Childers, polling in each community where the ads ran showed an increase in acceptance levels of the LGBT population in comparison to polling completed prior to the running of the ads.

In 2008 the organization published the book “CRISIS: 40 Stories Revealing the Personal, Social and Religious Pain and Trauma of Growing Up Gay In America.” The book, a collective of short stories from LGBT individuals, parents, straight allies and ministers, illuminates the psychological and emotional harm religion-based discrimination has caused.

Childers said that "the book includes people like Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, telling stories, talking about the pain and trauma they experienced during their youth. It doesn’t just come from the perspective of the individuals, but reinforcements from clergy and others.”

Faith in America, which has focused on a community by community approach, is currently undergoing an expansion phase as it seeks to impact a larger segment of the country.

"Our youth initiative will launch in the coming weeks to ensure that LGBT youth are provided with the best information to combat religion-based prejudice," Childers said. “I feel it is one of the most important initiatives we’ve undertaken to date.”

And in early 2011, Faith in America will launch a yet to be announced campaign in California. Leaders of the organization have already been in Southern California networking with various religious leaders and like-minded organizations in advance of the campaign.

Gold said that Faith in America is “ready to take a giant step forward, but we need the help of the LGBT community in order to do so.”

Learn more about Faith in America at www.faithinamerica.com.

A. Latham Staples is the president and CEO of Empowering Spirits Foundation, a national LGBT civil rights organization based in San Diego. Staples and his husband were one of the first same-sex couples to legally wed in California. Following the passage of Proposition 8 in California in November 2008 that defined marriage to be between only a man and a woman, Staples felt the need to become active in the LGBT civil rights movement. Staples, a 2010 Echoing Green Fellow, has a bachelor of arts in journalism and political science from the Honors College at Baylor University in Waco, Texas.


Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Mrs. Betty Bowers: Less is Mormon!

America's Best Christian, Mrs. Betty Bowers, calls out Mormons and schools all Americans on the unconstitutional craze of doling out civil rights by popular vote:

HOMOSEXUAL (SAME-SEX) MARRIAGES: An Interpretation of the American Constitution

by Mark Daniels

The issue of same-sex marriage has swamped our airwaves for the past several months and has taken center-stage in California.  There are many ways to look at this issue: personally, religiously, politically, emotionally, rationally, legally, even Constitutionally.


As a person directly affected by the outcome of this national social debate, I have looked at it from all these angles.  In so doing, I have found nothing at all which persuades me that there exists a rational reason to deny fully equal marital rights for same-sex couples.  


For sake of rational clarity, and for sake of driving home the most acceptable, even conservative reasons for my stand, the Federal Constitution shall serve as the backdrop for my discussion.


Mind you, I am not a Constitutional scholar, nor a lawyer.  I am a common, average American citizen who treasures the deep values of justice and equality our Constitution embodies and veterans across the ages have fought and died to preserve.  It is with that in mind that I present the following argument:

Our forefathers could never have dreamed this day would come, that gay men and women in America would fight for the right to marry just as heterosexuals marry.   The fact remains that the Constitution was written to "...secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity." (Preamble)

Since the legality of same-sex marriage has come under scrutiny, it is good to examine seemingly new philosophies and perspectives; how else can we determine the rightness of something?  But what hasn’t been considered is the legality of denying same-sex marriage.
Article Four of the Federal Constitution states:
"Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
Clause 1: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States."
Because the Constitution does not explicitly give the Federal Government jurisdiction over marriage, the right to regulate marriage is, by default, given solely to the States to decide.  Therefore, Congress had neither right nor power to pass the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in the first place.


The solution, some may argue, is to amend the Federal Constitution, which is what George W. Bush endorsed.  There is one problem with that:  Article Six reads:
"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United Statesshall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."
Boiled down, this means that the Constitution is barred from contradicting itself.  Thus, a Federal Marriage Amendment that would deprive a singled-out populace of any rights runs in clear contradiction to Article Four and Amendment Nine of the Constitution.  Amendment Nine states:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
The Constitution says in Amendment Fourteen:
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
What this basically means is that the States do not have a right to pick and choose the people to whom it will grant rights and privileges.  If one group of people is allowed to marry, all groups are allowed to marry.  If same-sex couples are barred from marriage, it is an abridgement of the privileges they are entitled to as citizens of the United States; it would be a deprivation of liberty and prosperity, and would strip same-sex couples of equal protection of the laws.  Plainly, it is discriminatory, and the Fourteenth Article clearly states that selective granting of privileges is not allowed in the United States.


Some may say, "Gays have the right to marry just as everyone else—a right to marry someone of the opposite gender."  Similar arguments were made in the days of miscegenation in the 1950’s and 1960’s:  "Blacks have the right to marry just as whites do—the right to marry someone of their own race."  Such a stance is clearly a form of hypocrisy and oppression, and has no place in the America our forebears envisioned, and contradicts the very basis of the repeal of the miscegenation laws.  Albeit slowly, Americans have striven over the years since Brown vs. the Board of Education to uphold that ruling socially; separate but equal is not equal.  In our societal efforts to make this ruling a social and legal reality, we have made tremendous strides to end all forms of discrimination, finally recognizing our fellow man and woman’s rights as unalienable regardless of creed, religion, race, gender, and even sexual orientation.


"
Equal rights are not special rights unless you're the one who doesn't have them."
horizontal rule

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Cardinal criticizes Mexico's high court for upholding law allowing gay marriages in capital


Cardinal criticizes Mexico's high court for upholding law allowing gay marriages in capital

Published August 08, 2010
| Associated Press



MEXICO CITY (AP) — Cardinal Norberto Rivera sharply criticized Mexico's Supreme Court on Sunday for upholding a law allowing homosexuals to marry in the capital, calling the ruling "aberrant" and "immoral."
The Roman Catholic archbishop said it was wrong to go against Christian doctrine that recognizes only marriages between a man and a woman.
"The church cannot fail to call evil evil," Rivera said in a statement.
On Thursday, the Supreme Court on an 8-2 vote upheld the constitutionality of gay marriages in Mexico City under a law passed by the state legislature. The federal government had sought to nullify the law.
The Federal District is the only part of Mexico that allows gay marriages. The city government said last week that since 320 same-sex couples had married since March, 173 of them male and 147 female.
Rivera said homosexuals have suffered abuses from the broader society, but argued that allowing same-sex marriages is not the way to try to atone for such injustices.
He called same-sex unions "inherently immoral," saying they "distort the nature of marriage raised by Christ to the dignity of a sacrament."
by Mark Daniels

I find it rather hypocritical to condemn same sex marriage, while the Roman Catholic Church continues to protect Pedophile Priests.  I don't think many people would disagree with the "Cardinal" if he condemned his fellow clergy for their aberrant and immoral behavior.  He could also address the atrocities committed by the Roman Catholic Church during World War II; the church allowed Hitler to use the Vatican bank to lauder the Jewish people's valuables.  The Cardinal could also address the Roman Catholic Church's direct involvement in the Canadian Holocaust.  Well, I guess you get the picture.  If you would like to learn more about the Canadian Holocaust, the New World Order and the Global Political Awakening, please click here.

I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION THE FACT THAT I KNOW MANY PEOPLE WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH THAT ARE GOOD PEOPLE.  THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IS NOT ALONE WHEN IT COMES TO IMMORAL AND ABERRANT BEHAVIOR.

RESOURCES:

A Moral Reckoning: The Role of the Church in the Holocaust and Its Unfulfilled Duty of Repair

Did Pope Pius XII Help the Jews?

Holocaust Scholars Write to the Vatican

Inside the Vatican of Pius XII: The Memoir of an American Diplomat During World War II

Pedophiles and Priests: Anatomy of a Contemporary Crisis

Delayed Impact: The Holocaust and the Canadian Jewish Community

By the Numbers: Accounting for the Cultural Genocide of Canada's Indigenous Peoples

Hidden From History

Friday, August 6, 2010

GOProud Announces Ann Coulter to Headline Homocon 2010 in New York City

GOProud Announces Ann Coulter to Headline Homocon 2010 in New York City

For Immediate Release
August 6, 2010

GOProud Announces Ann Coulter to Headline Homocon 2010 in New York City

(Washington, D.C.) – Today, GOProud, the only national organization representing gay conservatives and their allies, announced that conservative author Ann Coulter is headlining their first annual Homocon – a party to celebrate gay conservatives. “The gay left has done their best to take all the fun out of politics, with their endless list of boycotts and protests. Homocon is going to be our annual effort to counter the ‘no fun police’ on the left,” said Christopher Barron, Chairman of the Board of GOProud. “I can’t think of any conservative more fun to headline our inaugural party then the self-professed ‘right-wing Judy Garland’ – Ann Coulter.”
Ann Coulter is the author of seven New York Times bestsellers —Guilty: Liberal Victims and Their Assault on America (January 2009); If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans (October, 2007); Godless: The Church of Liberalism (June 2006); How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)(October, 2004); Treason: Liberal Treachery From the Cold War to the War on Terrorism (June 2003); Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right (June 2002); and High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton (August 1998).
Homocon 2010 will take place in New York City on the evening of Saturday September 25th. VIP Sponsorships are available for $2500 and general admission tickets go on sale August 20th. To purchase tickets or for more information: www.goproud.org.
“I can promise you, Homocon 2010 will be a hell of a lot more fun than chaining yourself to the White House fence,” concluded Barron.

Ann Coulter Headlining Gay Republican Bash - Gothamist

Ann Coulter Headlining Gay Republican Bash - Gothamist:


Step right up and get your tickets for the first annual Homocon! No, it's not a convention for escaped homosexual convicts (that would be awesome), it's a political convention for openly gay Republicans. They somehow exist, and GOProud, the only national organization representing gay conservatives, is throwing a big party next month to celebrate their cognitive dissonance. The headliner will be none other than Ann "Come On I Dare You To Punch Me in My Smug Face, You Fairy" Coulter, who previously called John Edwards a "faggot" when he was running for president, and called former vice president Al Gore a "total fag." This is going to be fabulous revolting.
"The gay left has done their best to take all the fun out of politics, with their endless list of boycotts and protests,"declares Christopher Barron, Chairman of the Board of GOProud. "Homocon is going to be our annual effort to counter the ‘no fun police’ on the left. I can’t think of any conservative more fun to headline our inaugural party then the self-professed ‘right-wing Judy Garland’—Ann Coulter." When you think about it, the Garland comparison isn't so crazy, because who doesn't wish upon a star that a tornado would come take Coulter away?
Tickets go on sale August 20th and cost $250. [Via Joe.My.God.]

Californigaytion-Is Gay Marriage Protected by the U.S. Constitution?

Californigaytion-Is Gay Marriage Protected by the U.S. Constitution?

Jasper Roberts Consulting - Widget