Translate

GPA Store: Featured Products

Showing posts with label CYBER-TERRORISM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CYBER-TERRORISM. Show all posts

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Authorities Plan To Trawl Phone Calls And E Mails For Signs Of “Resentment Toward Government”

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
September 30, 2010
Authorities Plan To Trawl Phone Calls And E Mails For Signs Of Resentment Toward Government  300910top
Photo: Pal Berge
Do you resent the government for enforcing Obamacare or raising your taxes? Write about it in an email or talk about it on the phone and you could be placed under surveillance as a potential terrorist, if frightening new technology being shopped to law enforcement agencies is implemented.
Forget pre-crime and get ready for face-crime, Big Brother is set to unleash a new wave of shockingly invasive and Orwellian technology on the American people if a recent symposium in Hamburg New York is anything to go by. Federal agencies, police departments and others were all in attendance to see a demonstration of a system that trawls phone conversations, emails and instant messages to detect “resentment toward government,” alerting authorities to potential “terrorists” who are then placed under surveillance.
The technology was demonstrated to law enforcement officials, mental health professionals, and military representatives at a recent International First Responder-Military Symposium held at Hilbert College.
“A Swiss professor working with a Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientist who heads the Mind Machine Project there outlined how this program operates through computerized scanning of phone calls and electronic messages sent through e-mail and social networking mechanisms,” reports the Buffalo News.
The system works by detecting “resentment in conversations through measurements in decibels and other voice biometrics,” more specifically the emotional spikes that characterize “hatred and deep resentment toward government.”
“As for written transmissions scrutinized by the computer program, it can detect the same patterns of fixation on specified subjects,” states the report.
Once an individual has been identified as harboring “resentment toward government,” the information can be “passed along to authorities so surveillance can begin.”
Besides law enforcement applications, the program is also designed to aid mental health professionals to help “war veterans” become emotionally stable, chillingly implying that distrust or hatred of government, which was hailed by the founding fathers as a vital virtue, is now considered a mental illness.
Of course, this technology completely violates the 4th amendment, but by introducing it as a tool to fight terrorism, authorities hope to skirt around the issue – the problem being that, as we have exhaustively documented, the federal government now sees any political activity whatsoever, be it anti-war protesters on the left, or anti-big government activists on the right, as potential domestic terrorists.
The technology is rationalized by its adherents, who claim that it will help stop terrorists in their tracks, while also being used against ‘troubled veterans and first responders’.
However, the introduction of a program that closely resembles George Orwell’s “facecrime” in 1984 has little to do with fighting extremist Muslims hiding in caves in central Asia, this is all about targeting the American people with total panopticon-style surveillance, while also creating a chilling atmosphere and reminding people that their every conversation, instant message or email is being scanned by super-computers for any sign of extremism or “resentment toward government”.
As we have seen from the MIAC report, the spying case in Pennsylvania, and a host of others in recent years, the federal government defines “terrorist propaganda” as any material critical of the state, therefore any dissent against Big Brother in a phone conversation or an email would automatically trigger the new technology.
This is not only a constitution killer, it represents a hammer blow to free speech. The Internet as a forum of open discourse and free exchange of ideas will be fundamentally damaged if people live in constant fear of being raided by the feds at any minute because they sounded off about the government in an e mail or a posting on a comment board.
Of course, with distrust towards the state touching all time highs, there are millions of Americans who “harbor hatred and deep resentment toward government,” but that doesn’t mean they plan on bombing federal buildings.
The technofascism blog dug up a couple of quotes from George Orwell’s 1984 that almost precisely describe the exact same technology being used in the legendary dystopia about a totalitarian society that constantly hounds, harasses, and surreptitiously spies on its citizens.
“It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself–anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face…; was itself a punishable offense. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime…”
-George Orwell, 1984, Book 1, Chapter 5
“Your worst enemy, he reflected, was your nervous system. At any moment the tension inside you was liable to translate itself into some visible symptom.”
- George Orwell, 1984, Book 1, Chapter 6
Rather than an improper facial expression or nervous tic, which was more within the purview of the equally ludicrous “gait analysis” division of Admiral John Poindexter’s Total Information Office, a program that claimed to be able to identify terrorists by the way they walk, the facecrime technology defines “abnormality” as being critical of the authorities, a frightening throwback to the Soviet psikhushkas — mental hospitals — which were used by the state as prisons in order to isolate political prisoners, discredit their ideas, and break them physically and mentally.
Indeed, the establishment media has intensified its dissemination of talking points that attempt to categorize distrust of authority as a mental disorder.
Although it survives under a number of different names with private sector funding, Total Information Awareness was mothballed by Congress in 2003 after widespread criticism that it would lead to the implementation of a “mass surveillance system”. Facecrime goes a step further, it not only creates a mass surveillance system of all our communications, it also corrodes and corrupts people’s confidence in being able to exercise their first amendment right to express “hatred and resentment toward government,” without being harassed and targeted as domestic terrorists.
Facecrime technology is illegal, immoral, anti-American and something that needs to be ditched permanently if the United States and indeed any free country is to heed George Orwell’s warning and resist the descent into totalitarianism.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show.



Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

Are you ready to evacuate?

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Will Stuxnet Malware Be Used In False Flag Attack?

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
September 25, 2010
Iran has admitted today that Stuxnet malware has infected its industrial computer system.
“An IT official of Iran’s mines and metals ministry told the Mehr news agency that 30,000 computers belonging to industrial units have already been infected by the virus,” reportsDeutsche Presse-Agentur today. “Mahmoud Alyaie told Mehr that the Iranian industrial control systems are made by Siemens and the Stuxnet is designed to attack exactly these systems and transfer classified data abroad.”

“Stuxnet has the ability to take advantage of the programming software to also upload its own code to… an industrial control system,” explains Symantec, the anti-virus software company. “Stuxnet can potentially control or alter how the system operates.” Symantec figures from August show 60 per cent of the computers infected by Stuxnet are located in Iran, up from 25 per cent in July.
On Friday, Max Fisher, writing for The Atlantic Wire, said cybersecurity officials report the malware is “widely disseminated” and “establishes a new precedent in the sophistication and threat of cyberwarfare.” The officials said the software has embedded itself across computer systems at a number of power facilities and factories over the past year. “It’s unknown who created it, to what end, and what exactly Stuxnet would have done if it had not been discovered,” writes Fisher.
The malware is not spread over the internet. It must be manually inserted on a network computer by an external device such as a USB drive.
Since the software is now being used against the primary target of the globalists, Iran, it should be a no-brainer who created it — the Pentagon.
On the other hand, Richard Falkenrath, a principal at Chertoff Group and a Bloomberg Television contributing editor, believes the malware was designed and unleashed by Israel. Falkenrath told Bloomberg that the worm is so sophisticated that only the resources of a nation-state would be able to produce it. See the Bloomberg video here.
In August, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee claimed the Pentagon was the victim of a cyber attack.
  • A D V E R T I S E M E N T

“This latest revelation underscores the scary reality of how vulnerable we really are to cyber criminals, terrorists, and nation-states seeking to use technology to steal from us or do us harm,” said Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware.
Carper, who is the chairman of the Homeland Security’s Federal Financial Management Subcommittee, said the attack underscored the need for legislation he co-sponsored with Homeland Security Chairman Joe Lieberman. Carper and Lieberman’s legislation would establish the office of cyber policy in the White House.
The law, if passed, would also establish a National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications within the Department of Homeland Security that would enforce cybersecurity policies across the government and would include mission creep into private sector cybersecurity.
In July, a Senate committee approved the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act. It would give Obama an internet “kill switch.”
The Wall Street Journal published an article today warning that “cyber espionage” has increased against governments and companies around the world in the past year.
“More than 100 countries are currently trying to break into U.S. networks, defense officials say. China and Russia are home to the greatest concentration of attacks,” reports the Journal.
In response to the alleged threat of increased cyber tomfoolery, the Pentagon’s Cyber Command is scheduled to be up and running next month.
In May, the Pentagon said it would consider a military response in the case of a cyber attack against the United States. The Pentagon’s cyber command is now led by Lieutenant General Keith Alexander, head of the National Security Agency.
In addition, the Obama administration has designated cyber security as a “critical national asset” and has stepped up efforts to combat the drastically overstated threat, including the creation of Homeland Security SWAT teams to respond to cyber attacks on critical infrastructure.
The illegal covert war against Iran aside, the hype over the Stuxnet worm provides an excellent opportunity for the government to ramp up its police state efforts against the American people. Most folks are not concerned about ineffectual underwear and barbeque grill propane tank non-bombers, but they stand up and take notice when the lights and water go out.
Is it possible there is a Stuxnet false flag attack right around the corner?



Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Big Sis To Get Expanded Role In Policing Internet

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
September 14, 2010
Two cybersecurity bills that would hand President Obama the power to shut down parts of the Internet in the event of a national emergency have now been merged into a single unified piece of legislation that Democrats will try to pass before the end of the year, with the Department of Homeland Security being given a larger role in policing the world wide web.
nap5.jpg
Janet Napolitano’s DHS will be handed broader authority to determine how to handle potential cybersecurity threats. Photo: Center for American Progress.
Under the new draft bill, which is a combination of the two versions originally crafted by Senators Joe Lieberman and Jay Rockefeller, Janet Napolitano’s DHS will be handed broader authority to determine how to handle potential cybersecurity threats.
“DHS will get expanded authorities. I think that’s clear,” said James Lewis, a cybersecurity expert with think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies, who has studied the new bill.
An expanded role for Homeland Security would be somewhat ironic given the fact that the DHS itself recently failed an extensive cyber-security audit conducted by the agency’s own Inspector General.
“The DHS US-CERT office is currently plagued by at least 600 vulnerabilities that could compromise sensitive data, including 202 which have been classified as high-risk,” reported TG Daily.
Homeland Security’s failure to adequately secure its own internal network will lead to questions about why the agency should be given vast new authority to secure America’s cyber assets and the public Internet.
Democrats want to get the bill passed within the next four weeks, although “sticking points” could delay the legislation, according to a Senate aide familiar with the bill. However, lawmakers are determined to put the package up for a vote before the end of the year.
“Senate Majority Harry Reid has put the measure on his list of top-priority bills to get through the Senate this year,” sources told MoneyControl.com.
Lieberman’s version of the original bill includes language that would hand President Obama the power to shut down parts of the world wide web for at least four months with no congressional oversight. The combined version appears to shift that responsibility to DHS, who under the pretext of a national emergency could block all Internet traffic to the U.S. from certain countries, and close down specific hubs and networks, creating an ominous precedent for government regulation and control over the Internet.
Cybersecurity legislation is being promoted as a vital tool to defend the nation’s critical infrastructure against cyber- terrorism. However, as we have highlighted, the threat from cyber-terrorists to the U.S. power grid or water supply is minimal. The perpetrators of an attack on such infrastructure would have to have direct physical access to the systems that operate these plants to cause any damage. Any perceived threat from the public Internet to these systems is therefore completely contrived and strips bare what many fear is the real agenda behind cybersecurity – to enable the government to regulate free speech on the Internet.
As we reported back in March, the Obama administration’s release of the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative, a government plan to “secure” (or control) the nation’s public and private sector computer networks, coincided with Democrats attempting to claim that the independent news website The Drudge Report was serving malware, an incident Senator Jim Inhofe described as a deliberate ploy “to discourage people from using Drudge”.
Fears that cybersecurity legislation could be used to stifle free speech were heightened when Senator Lieberman told CNN’s Candy Crowley that the real motivation behind the bill was to mimic the Communist Chinese system of Internet policing.
“Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” said Lieberman.
As we have documented, the Communist Chinese government does not disconnect parts of the Internet because of genuine security concerns, it habitually does so only to oppress and silence victims of government abuse and atrocities, and to strangle dissent against the state, a practice many fear is the ultimate intention of cybersecurity in the United States.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show.



Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"! Print this page
Jasper Roberts Consulting - Widget