You can't come forward against the world's most powerful intelligence agencies and be completely free from risk, because they're such powerful adversaries that no one can meaningfully oppose them.If they want to get you, they’ll get you in time. But at the same time you have to make a determination about what it is that’s important to you.
And if living - living unfreely but comfortably is something you’re willing to accept - and I think many of us are; it's the human nature - you can get up every day, you can go to work, you can collect your large paycheck for relatively little work, against the public interest, and go to sleep at night after watching your shows.But if you realize that that’s the world that you helped create, and it’s going to get worse with the next generation and the next generation, who extend the capabilities of this sort of architecture of oppression, you realize that you might be willing to accept any risk, and it doesn't matter what the outcome is, so long as the public gets to make their own decisions about how that’s applied.
'The world will remember Edward Snowden.' The People's Daily praised him for 'tearing off Washington's sanctimonious mask.' At the same time, it rejected accusations that Beijing facilitated his Hong Kong departure.
Not only did the US authorities not give us an explanation and apology, it instead expressed dissatisfaction at the Hong Kong special administrative region for handling things in accordance with law.
In a sense, the United States has gone from a 'model of human rights' (sic) to 'an eavesdropper on personal privacy', the 'manipulator' of the centralised power over the international internet, and the mad 'invader' of other countries' networks.
In his first September 26, 2008 presidential debate, Obama said:
"One of the first things I intend to do as President is restore America’s standing in the world. We are less respected now than we were eight years ago or even four years ago."
(W)hen it comes to anti-American chutzpah, there's no beating Rafeal Correa, the autocratic leader of tiny, impoverished Ecuador.
Taking in Mr. Snowden would allow Mr. Correa to advance his most cherished ambition: replacing the deceased Hugo Chavez as the hemisphere's preeminent anti-US demagogue. It would thwart the Justice Department's attempt to prosecute the fugitive American.
The one who is denounced pursues the denouncer. The man who tries to provide light and transparency to issues that affect everyone is pursued by those who should be giving explanations about the denunciations that have been presented.