The US government, just as they did with other whistleblowers, immediately and predictably destroyed any possibility of a fair trial at home, openly declaring me guilty of treason and that the disclosure of secret, criminal, and even unconstitutional acts is an unforgivable crime.
That's not justice, and it would be foolish to volunteer yourself to it if you can do more good outside of prison than in it.
Ask yourself: If I were a Chinese spy, why wouldn't I have flown directly to Beijing? I could be living in a palace petting a phoenix by now.
(H)e closed the door on investigating systemic violations of law, deepened and expanded several abusive programs, and refused to spend the political capital to end the kind of human rights violations like we see in Guantanamo, where men still sit without charge.
It's important to bear in mind I'm being called a traitor by a man who gave us the warrantless wiretapping scheme as a kind of atrocity warm-up on the way to deceitfully engineering a conflict that has killed over 4,400 and maimed nearly 32,000 Americans, as well as leaving over 100,000 Iraqis dead.
Being called a traitor by Dick Cheney is the highest honor you can give an American.
I pointed out where the NSA has hacked civilian infrastructure such as universities, hospitals, and private businesses because it is dangerous. These nakedly, aggressively criminal acts are wrong no matter the target.
NSA is running network operations against (the rights of) millions of innocent people. And for what?
So we can have secret access to a computer in a country we're not even fighting? So we can potentially reveal a potential terrorist with the potential to kill fewer Americans than our own Police?
No, the public needs to know the kinds of things a government does in its name, or the 'consent of the governed' is meaningless.
Phone number(s), email(s), user id(s), cell phone handset id(s) (IMEI), and so on - it's all the same. The restrictions against this are policy based, not technically based, and can change at any time.
They excuse this as 'incidental' collection, but at the end of the day, someone at NSA still has the content of your communications.
Even in the event of 'warranted' intercept, it's important to understand the intelligence community doesn't always deal with what you would consider a 'real' warrant like a police department would have to.
The 'warrant' is more of a templated form they fill out and send to a reliable judge with a rubber stamp.