Home
Contact Us
Donate
Support Us
Store
Books
Videos
Global Political Awakening and the New World Order
Quotes
Translate
GPA Store: Featured Products
Thursday, March 3, 2011
US Libyan Policy: Zero Legitimacy
Tony Cartalucci,
Contributing Writer
Activist Post
From the very beginning the US-backed Libyan unrest played out in oafish measures, crutched along by the most irresponsible, intellectually dishonest "journalism" to date. A week before the unrest began, it was the the London based National Conference of Libyan Opposition (NCLO) that
called for the February 17th "Day of Rage,"
not Libyans in the streets of Tripoli or Benghazi.
The NCLO itself was
created in London in 2005
by Ibrahim Sahad and his National Front for the Salvation of Libya (NFSL), which in turn has been one of the leading Libyan opposition groups since the 1980's. The
Daily Globe and Mail has reported
that Sahad's NFSL had been behind several attempted armed uprisings and assassination attempts against Qaddafi in the 1980's, while
records found in the US Library of Congress
indicate Sahad's NFSL had CIA support and training.
Sahad himself now directs the unrest in Libya from Washington D.C. while giving interviews with the corporate owned media literally in front of the White House.
Initial reports coming out of Libya after Sahad's "Day of Rage" unfolded, told tales of bone-chilling atrocities committed by Qaddafi against "unarmed protesters." Qaddafi was accused of
strafing crowds of unarmed protesters
from the air,
storming hospitals
and kidnapping injured patients,
mosque massacres
, and just about anything else the imaginations of the corporate owned media could conjure up.
BBC did however concede
that nearly all of their reports were impossible to confirm, as they were all entirely based on opposition "witness accounts."
This week, Russian military officials boldly asserted that
such air strikes never took place
, and even the
US Department of Defense was forced to concede
that such attacks could not be confirmed.
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was asked recently "
Do you see any evidence that he [Qaddafi] actually has fired on his own people from the air?" to which he
responded by saying, "
We’ve seen the press reports, but we have no confirmation of that." Admiral Mullen added, "
That’s correct. We’ve seen no confirmation whatsoever."
Strangely enough, calls for military intervention to stop non-existing, unverified atrocities are only growing stronger.
The reality now appears that the "protesters" are actually
heavily armed insurgents
who obliterated entire sections of steel-reinforced concrete walls of a Benghazi army base, then seized heavy artillery and armored vehicles before shoring up armed rebels in nearby towns and cities.
The New York Times reported
that weapons were coming in across the Egyptian border, while
US
and
UK government mouthpieces called for providing additional arms
and training for the rebels. The New York Times' latest piece, "
Libyan Rebels Said to Debate Seeking U.N. Airstrikes
" features images of insurgents receiving military training, further suggesting the unrest is the result of a yet another NFSL military operation rather than a "spontaneous" protest turned violent.
Interestingly enough, the New York Times piece also depicts the UN enforced no-fly zone as now being an opportunity to offensively cripple Qaddafi's forces and dislodge him from power. Knowing now that the "atrocities" Qaddafi supposedly committed never happened and that the US has been intentionally trumping up war propaganda to ensure yet another NFSL uprising didn't fail, we can assume that offensive intervention was the globalists' plan from the beginning.
With the entire justification for US/NATO/UN intervention unraveling before military assets are even put into place, is the Anglo-American establishment so utterly desperate as to continue on in spite of reality and an awakening public? Is it not bad enough the Libyan opposition is openly working out of Washington D.C., but to also have the US military assist these foreign backed rebels into power at the cost of Libya's sovereignty? Qaddafi has been accused of many things as of late - but it appears when everyone tells their side of the story,
his regime's tale of a foreign plot
strikes closer to the truth than the rest of the "international community."
US Predator drones: 100% verified to be strafing civilians
from the air during their extra-judicial execution sorties.
The "international community," in this latest display of intellectual dishonesty, poor statesmanship, horrific double standards, and outright unwarranted aggression, has forfeited the last of whatever legitimacy it may have claimed to hold. The American and British oligarchs in particular have shown the world they are irresponsible, back-stabbing, meddling rouges interfering with the sovereignty of other nations through invasive diplomacy, propaganda, and direct military force. Worse yet, they do so on behalf of expanding their financial empires, as their "humanitarian concerns" are utterly laughable considering the mayhem they are conducting in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan where civilian populations
really are being strafed from the air
. Whatever the globalists do from this point on, they do so with zero legitimacy and the resulting bloodshed is entirely on their hands.
Tony Cartalucci's articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at
Land Destroyer
.
Recently by Tony Cartalucci:
Destroying Libya
Globalist Coup Plotters Acting Shady
Libya: The Rest of the Story
Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:
Delivered by
FeedBurner
0 Comments
Disqus
Fb Comments
[Get It]
Comments :
Newer Post
Older Post
Home