Media Will Use Oscar Pistorius Verdict To Hide 9/11 Awakening

Hang The Bankers


Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Subscribe to GLOBAL POLITICAL AWAKENING by Email

9/11 TRUTH: Hollywood Speaks Out (Original HD Film)

Youtube


Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Be the Change! Share this using the tools below.

Victims' Families Want To Air New 9/11 Truth Ad (Video)

YouTube -- BuildingWhat


Help get this new ad on the air, donate at http://RememberBuilding7.org --- RememberBuilding7 is a non-partisan effort led by 9/11 family members to raise awareness of the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7.

Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Don't Ask, Don't Tell: The U.S. Military's Cover-up of 9/11

THE EXCAVATOR

The 9/11 crime and cover-up would not have been possible if high-ranking generals in the U.S. military were not informed about the attacks ahead of time and rewarded for their participation in that unforgivable act of treason against the American people and the United States of America. So, while the Bush administration is definitely to blame for the 9/11 attacks, as well as the intelligence agencies of other U.S. allies, particularly Israel's Mossad, we shouldn't overlook the involvement of certain men in the U.S. military.

Traitors in the ranks of the U.S. military probably played the most crucial role in the September 11 attacks because special military coordination, military knowledge, and military skill were required to execute such a large-scale operation. A group of in-the-know generals in the U.S. military selfishly advanced their own careers by assisting in the murder of Americans and later covered-up the crime. They took advantage of the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity instead of exposing the traitorous plans to strike New York and Washington to the American people. A special place in hell is reserved for these dishonorable and immoral dogs of war.

The corruption of the U.S. military shouldn't be shocking to anyone. Corruption and deceit is part of most national standing armies. Egypt's military is notoriously corrupt, so is Russia's military, and Iran's Revolutionary Guards has been accused of profiting immensely from sanctions. The point is that a large military is a threat to individual liberty and true national defense. Thomas Jefferson famously opposed standing armies, and supported citizen militias who could be called up at any time the country was under attack. But Jefferson's wise advice was ignored. Rather than depending on brave and virtuous citizens armed with weapons to protect their freedoms and defend their land, America and most nations depend on corrupt and godless standing armies for their defense - armies which consist of millions of slaves who are sent by their evil government masters to fight meaningless and profit-driven wars. The military is "a living monument to tyranny,"said the German poet Heinrich von Kleist.

I don't know the names of the traitors in the U.S. military who were part of the planning and execution of the 9/11 attacks but I will venture a guess and say that Ret. Gen. John “Jack” Sheehan was one of them. Sheehan was a member of the Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group which produced a report in 1998 called "Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy," that was written by three men, Ashton B. Carter, a U.S. National Security expert, Co-Director of Preventive Defense Project, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics for President Barack Obama; John. M. Deutch, former United States Deputy Secretary of Defense, a member of the Trilateral Commission, and a member of the Board of Directors of numerous criminal companies such as Citigroup and Raytheon; andPhilip D. Zelikow, who served as the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, which covered up evidence implicating senior government officials, ignored key witnesses who gave a different version of what happened on 9/11, and pushed the official conspiracy theory that Al-Qaeda was responsible for the attacks.

The Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group was "a nine-month long collaboration of faculty from Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, and the University of Virginia," and included "experts on national security, terrorism, intelligence, law enforcement, constitutional law, technologies of Catastrophic Terrorism and defenses against them, and government organization and management." The group consisted of 20 terrorism analysts, academic professionals, military professionals, and other experts, including Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, President of the World Bank and former managing director of Goldman Sachs Robert Zoellick, international relations scholar and Harvard Professor Joseph Nye, and many other disgusting creatures such as Retired General Jack Sheehan, the former Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Atlantic Command.

It is not a coincidence that Zelikow, one of the main authors of the "Catastrophic Terrorism" report was later picked by the Bush administration to replace Henry Kissinger as the Director of the 9/11 Commission who resigned because there were complaints about his conflicts of interest. Of course, Zelikow also had conflicts of interest but they were not disclosed to the press, the American people, and members of Congress.

It is also not a coincidence that members of the Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group were placed in influential posts in the U.S. government and international bodies, like Robert Zoellick of the World Bank, wholooks like an evil Bond villain.

General Jack Sheehan was rewarded by being given the title of Senior Vice President at Bechtel Corporation, the largest engineering company in America which had close relations with the Republican Party and Bush administration and was handed a $680 million Iraq contract immediately after the war began. Bechtel was also chosenearly on to manage the clean up of the World Trade Center site after the 9/11 attacks, the cost of which was over 2 billion dollars. Here is an excerpt from an article called "New York Officials May Hire Bechtel For Trade Center Job," that was written by Debra K. Rubin and Aileen Cho on November 19, 2001:

Read Full Article

Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

The New American Century - PNAC Exposed

Every war America has been involved with has been exposed as frauds!

1. Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad) 

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

Jesse Ventura Calls For New 9/11 Investigation; Challenges Media

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
October 29, 2010

Former Governor of Minnesota, ex-Navy SEAL and retired pro-wrestler Jesse Ventura has renewed the call for a new investigation into the events of 9/11 in the face of dramatic new evidence that is coming to light every week.

“You’ve got all this evidence but clearly when you look at what happened, and the results of all of it, it shows clearly that these commissions and these official government investigations are frauds.” Ventura told nationally syndicated radio host Alex Jones.

“They don’t seek the truth, they are there to simply push the government’s story of whatever that may be – what they want said about what happened.” Ventura continued as he and Jones presented and analyzed previously unseen video and eyewitness accounts from September 11 2001 that suggest secondary explosions were a contributing factor to the destruction of the World Trade Center.

“When you look at the whole commission, it got run by Zelikow, who comes right out of the White House – he was the guy in charge. If they didn’t unanimously agree on something, it wasn’t even entered into it.” Ventura noted, also adding that the 9/11 Commission failed to even mention the total and symmetrical collapse of building 7, a 47 story skyscraper that was not attacked on 9/11, yet fell straight down into it’s own footprint later the same afternoon.

“Anything that doesn’t fit into their scenario, they just ignore.” Ventura added.

The former governor also noted that originally there was never even going to be an investigation into the attacks of any kind, and that it was only via pressure from the victims’ relatives that a commission was appointed.

“When pressure came from the families and they demanded an investigation, well who’s the first person they come up with to run it? Henry Kissinger. Well, there was outcry and outrage over that because of all of his contacts and everything he’s into… Then you look at it from a logical point of view, did they really and truly want to investigate?” Ventura stated.

“Well when you learn that they spent a hundred million dollars to investigate Whitewater – where ultimately in the end I guess they learned that the president cheated on his wife – and then initially for the murder of 3,000 people at 9/11, they allocate 4 million. It ended up going to 12 or 13 million in the end but that alone should cause you to say there wasn’t a real investigation going to be done here.” he added.

Ventura also commented on the recent video releases from NIST, following Freedom of Information Act requests.Yesterday we highlighted a newly discovered video in which the director of the FBI in New York is seen interviewing firefighters after the collapse of one of the trade towers, and discussing “secondary hits” being responsible.

“NIST has all this information in their possession, and yet their report chooses to ignore it and not even mention it. How much more simple can it be for someone out there to look at that and go ’something is rotten in Denmark here’.” Ventura said.

“Shouldn’t they have at least addressed it and said that ‘well we had many reports of firefighters and officials saying bombs were going off’, and then give an explanation as to why these people were wrong?”

Ventura also had harsh words for the corporate media and it’s culpability in allowing a cover up to prosper.

“You have to remember, the mainstream media is not the ally.” Ventura said.

“I’m just baffled, it’s beyond words. The mainstream media, was supposed to be our fourth branch of government, the unwritten fourth branch by our forefathers. Their job was to be the check, to be the watchdog and watch the other three branches of government and keep them honest, and now that they have sold us out we are in dire straights.” he added.

“These stories should be the lead stories on TV right now. Not do downgrade you or I, but the only place they are hearing them is on your radio show and a few other non mainstream outlets.” Ventura told Jones.

“I’m getting censored more and more. The access that I had two years ago, I had way more two years ago than what I’m getting now. I’m being cut back too, I can’t get on all the shows I’d like to get on anymore.” he added.

Ventura also vilified the media’s portrayal of 9/11 researchers, noting that “The mainstream portrays 9/11 truthers as being some fringe element and some wild crazy liberals or whatever they are out there.”

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

“They don’t realise that the 9/11 truth movement, the great majority of it is professionals. These are not people that are crazy, in fact they are courageous because they are putting their professional integrity on the line to ask the questions.” Ventura asserted.

Watch the full interview below:

———

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor at Alex Jones’ Infowars.net, and regular contributor to Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

EXCLUSIVE: Uncovered 9/11 Footage Shows FBI Director Asking Firefighters About “Secondary Hits” On WTC

Amazing video also shows city officials hurriedly leaving after South Tower collapse

Steve Watson
Infowars.comWednesday, Oct 27th, 2010

An intriguing video has appeared on You Tube that appears to show a FDNY film crew being interviewed in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks by the the director of the FBI’s New York office, who has suspicions that one of the World Trade Center towers took a “secondary hit” before collapsing.

The video appears to be part of NIST’s recent FOIA releases and therefore has not been seen before now.

On first viewing it appears to be nothing special, just the horribly familiar scenes of dust and rubble from the aftermath of the attacks. However, it contains a stunning exchange between officials and firefighters.

The action appears to be taking place immediately after the collapse of the South tower and before the collapse of the North tower.

The film crew exits a building and make their way along the dust and debris littered streets.

At around 2 mins 50, a man in a suit approaches the crew and announces himself as “FBI, Barry Mawn.”

Mawn (pictured below with Rudy Giuliani) was at that time the director of the FBI’s New York office.

Mawn then asks the FDNY crew a question in the form of a statement – “That tower got a secondary hit?”

The firefighters respond by saying they are unsure but they heard a rumbling and ran for their lives as the tower then collapsed.

The audio is difficult to hear but one of the firefighters then says he “saw it blow right out the side of the building” to which Mawn asks “that was the plane right?”.

The firefighter then states “I don’t know if it was a plane or an explosion.”

As they continue their description of events the noise of a jet overhead interrupts them as people begin to panic. Someone, presumably another FBI agent shouts “is that ours?” to which Mawn replies “yeah that should be ours”.

At this point a large gathering of suited individuals walks into view and a woman in the group yells “go to city hall.”

Mawn then asks “where is the mayor?”, from which it can be deduced that this group is affiliated with Rudy Giuliani and they are hurriedly leaving the scene.

The woman leading the mayor’s group then curses at reporters telling them to “get the f*** out of here”.

One commenter has speculated that the reporters are with Pat Dawson, the first NBC News correspondent to report from the scene of the attacks at the World Trade Center.

Watch the video:

We have previously covered the fact that Giuliani and his group were warned that the South tower was about to collapse, before it happened. This video of them leaving the scene just after the collapse of the South tower dovetails directly with that information – another huge finding to emerge from the NIST video releases.

The video is a fascinating piece of evidence to be added to the hundreds of other accounts and descriptions of secondary explosions in and around the WTC on 9/11. This clearly indicates that the FBI believed that a secondary attack, aside from the use of air planes was under way.

Indeed, this backs up previous evidence that the FBI’s initial working premise was that trucks packed with explosives aided the collapse of the twin towers. This fact was reported by USA today journalist Jack Kelly:

The details were also covered by MSNBC’s Rick Sanchez, who also reported that officials strongly believed a van packed with explosives parked underneath the towers had contributed to their collapse.

Barry Mawn has other intriguing connections to the events of 9/11. He was a close friend and associate of John O’ Neil, the former deputy director for the FBI who quit his job out of frustration that his investigations into Al Qaeda terrorist plots were being blocked. O’Neil became head of security for the World Trade Center on September 11th 2001. His body was discovered in the rubble after the attacks after he had helped people escape the towers before they collapsed.

Mawn was also the individual who explained to the media how police and the FBI found the passport of one of the alleged hijackers, Satam Al Suqami, in the rubble during a “grid search” of the area close to the World Trade Center.

Mawn was later involved in the investigation of the Anthrax attacks, which he initially believed originated from US military sources. Mawn resigned from the FBI in March 2002 following the break down of this investigation.

The information revealed in this short piece of footage once again goes to show that there is still masses of evidence regarding the 9/11 attack that we are yet to discover. It should encourage 9/11 researchers to continue to dig deeper and demand a new independent investigation.

Related Reading:

CBS Report On 9/11: Ground Level Explosion Caused WTC To Collapse

New 9/11 Footage Reveals WTC 7 Explosions

Video: 9/11 Firefighters Reveal Huge Explosions Before Towers Collapsed

——————————————————————

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor at Alex Jones’ Infowars.net, and regular contributor to Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

Four men railroaded in plot to bomb synagogues

Jerry Mazza
Infowars.com
October 20, 2010

We the wards of Homeland Security, 9/11, and its Commission of Omissions, have sunk even lower into entrapment as a form political op now. This perhaps surpasses the sheer illogic and stupidity of the original shoe bomber, underwear bomber, and Broadway car bomber, who all lacked blasting caps on their bombs, the latest, Faisal Shahzad, recently sentenced to life imprisonment, warning us to expect more bloodshed at the hands of Muslims, and more tales from the Langley crypt.

Today the New York Times reports Four Men [were] Convicted in a Plot to Bomb Synagogues. “Accused of planting bombs outside synagogues in the Bronx and plotting to fire missiles at military planes, they were convicted on Monday, in a case that was widely seen as an important test of the entrapment defense. In just eight weeks, a jury of six women and five men deliberated in Federal District Court in Manhattan to find them guilty, a multiple Ox-Bow Incident.

Of course, the prosecutors counted on recorded conversations between the informer, Shahed Hussain, and the defendants.

The four defendants were reported as Onta Williams, Laguerre Payen, James Cromitie and David Williams IV and they face up to life in prison. Mr. Williams and Mr. Payen were found not guilty of one charge, attempting to kill officers and employees of the United States. Well, that’s a relief.

On the other hand, Mr. Cromitie was featured in most of the records, the first to meet the fink Hussain, and the most talkative. Cromitie, “filled with bravado,” made anti-Semitic statements and spoke of violent acts, though he had doubts about his “intentions,” which should have proved Cromitie and the other men were “reluctant participants”. The focus on Hussain as a “liar and manipulator” who “coaxed impoverished men toward a violence they were not predisposed to was the key requirement for an entrapment defense, though in all of the 9/11 terrorism cases that’s never worked. Once suckered in, the suckers don’t get out.

It even stalled jury deliberations at some point. Jurors revealed “they had seen evidence that was not introduced at trial, including a transcript that the judge had called inadmissible.” But Judge Coleen McMahon turned down a request by defense lawyers for mistrial. No kidding. She even dismissed a juror who’d seen the no-no transcript, and called for other jurors to resume their deliberations. That’s what they call “blind justice.”

“Prosecutors said the men, who all lived in Newburgh, N.Y., a poverty-fraught town, willingly cooperated with an informer working for the Federal Bureau of Investigation who posed as a terrorist and supplied the men with inert bombs and Stinger missile tubes. Somehow, just by happenstance their targets were synagogues and, of course, military bases. Synagogues were picked as targets presumably to inflame the Jewish population that these were more crazed (non) Muslims out to get them.

If that is not entrapment, and worse, discrimination against these hand-picked individuals by an FBI mole “who posed as a terrorist and supplied the men with inert bombs and Stinger missile tubes,” then call me a fool for the love of justice.

In an attempt to be “fair and balanced,” the authorities said that the four men “also planned to travel to Stewart International Airport in Newburgh, north of New York City, to fire missiles at military transport planes.” So these poor saps literally, are both threats to our Jewish Americans and our military. Got some good script guys at Langley, real good.

Zazi and the boyz

This story is reminiscent of another story from the New York Daily News in April, 2010, Zazi, Al Qaeda pals planned rush-hour attack on Grand Central, Times Square subway stations, in which “chilling new details about the foiled Al Qaeda plot to blow up the city’s busiest subways have emerged as a fourth suspect was quietly arrested in Pakistan.

“The unidentified man, who helped plan the plot, is expected to be extradited to the U.S. to be tried in Brooklyn Federal Court with Adis Medunjanin and Zarein Ahmedzay of Flushing, Queens,” sources said.

Of course, “The cooperation of would-be lead bomber Najibullah Zazi has helped (read rat out) law enforcement officials to piece together a fuller picture of the evil plan (his) to kill innocent straphangers around the 9/11 anniversary last year.”

Zazi and his two Queens friends allegedly planned to strap explosives to their bodies and split up, heading for “Grand Central and Times Square stations – the two busiest subway stations in New York City.”

Zazi’s patsies were supposed to board trains 1, 2, 3 and 6 at rush hour and later put themselves in the middle of the packed trains to make sure the maximum “carnage occurred” when they blew themselves up and hit the air-conditioning. Well, it’s one way to get a seat at rush hour.

Meanwhile, during Zazi’s short visit to Queens from his Denver home last September, he rode the subway over and over to Grand Central and Wall St. stations, “scouting where to best spread death and mayhem,” the sources said. Boy, that’s juicy stuff. Makes you scared while it makes your blood boil.

Also, Zazi has confessed that he, Medunjanin and Ahmedzay (buddies from Flushing High School, Flushing High School?) journeyed to Pakistan in August 2008, of course, “to fight with the Taliban against U.S. forces in Afghanistan.” What else is new? Of course, they were recruited by Al Qaeda for the Manhattan "martyrdom" mission. I mean this story of dummies on a mission keeps repeating itself. And the dummies reading this crap keep buying it.

Oh, and “they received military training at a terror camp in the Waziristan region, and Zazi was taken aside and given special bomb-making training because of his knowledge of the subway system.” Good thing he didn’t know about the Staten Island ferries. He might have crashed the same ferry with his boyz like two real ferry captains did on two different occasions with their crews.

“The attack was to take place on Sept. 14, 15 or 16 – as soon as the bombs had been assembled – with Sept. 14 the most likely date, sources said.”

But then, “Zazi acknowledged in court that the plan was aborted when he became aware that the FBI and the NYPD were on to him.” What a surprise.

He dumped the bomb-making recipes and explosives and flew back to Denver, where he was arrested a few days later.” He began cooperating this year. So the mole gets a deal for bringing in his two buddies.

The Blind Sheik Raman and the FBI

Then we go all the way back to the 1993 WTC bombing and the Blind Sheik Raman and his boyz, the FBI planting a mole in their midst, 46-year old Emad Salem, ex-Egyptian Army Officer, in medias res offering to provide 1300 pounds of blasting powder for the van-bomb to be planted in the basement. At some point, Salem tells the FBI, he can supply just plain powder to the Sheik, nobody will get hurt, and they can still bust the Sheik for conspiring to bomb the WTC.  But the FBI makes it happen and asks for the hot sauce, and boom, there goes the van-bomb in the basement, BABOOM, six dead, 1000 injured. Read the New York Times story about it here or above, at WhatReallyHappened.

So, on and on it goes, the more obvious, the more flagrant, the more illegal the ops get. They have to keep that War on Terror going, keep the people frightened and angry. God forbid you suggest 9/11 was an inside job like I did in the denial of victim families to go to court, i.e. The dust not settled on the last 9/11 victim family claim for a trial?

Even veteran historians, who have written about CIA and US government ops that occurred around the world since WWII will say you’re a crackpot. I won’t mention names to protect that true crackpots who have done some notable work, but somehow they can’t make the connect to 9/11 being the mother of false-flag attacks, the inciting incident needed to begin the War on Terror, to keep it fresh, so that they could begin their march to World Hegemony, Zig Heil! First, destroying Iraq, now bleeding our soldiers again in more years of Afghanistan, and bombing Pakistan with drones, etcetera, just to have a hold on the oil, the minerals, the real estate, the power. They’re all connected these aftershocks of 9/11, boom, one after the other, and they seem never to stop.

In fact, on 9/11, 2010 it was all about those awful “bloody” Muslims purportedly infiltrated in our very midst, even wanting an Islamic Learning Center two blocks from 9/11. And only to find out (mostly no one knew) that the Imam was funded by the Council on Foreign Relations funded by the Rockefeller Brothers, the Carnegie Foundation and their elite pals of the New World Order. So keep on shivering in your boots, America. Or, if you smell rat, trust it’s our friends in Intel and Law Enforcement land, looking for their Christmas bonuses, and some more blood.

In fact, the capper this weekend was in Astoria, Long Island, no less, with a faux “car bomb” explosion-exercise drill conducted by the Office of Emergency Management (OEM), headed up by Joe Bruno (whoever he is). Why they had store window models posing as downed folk, real folks being led in an orderly manner somewhere and ambulances and lots of police cars and lots of police and lots of big guns in their hands and on their hips and enough fire-power to take down the Bronx. And of course as that home-grown baloney was being sliced, we received notices that Al Qaeda (“the base,” CIA Brand Name) oh gosh, is now active in France. I say Vive La France! Vive L’Amerique, Vive Le Monde!

Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer, life-long resident of New York City. His book “State Of Shock – Poems from 9/11 on” is available at www.jerrymazza.com, Amazon.com andBarnesandnoble.com. He has also written hundreds of articles on politics and government as Associate Editor of onlinejournal.com.

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page

New 9/11 Footage Reveals WTC 7 Explosions

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
October 13, 2010

Newly obtained 9/11 eyewitness footage that NIST fought tooth and nail to keep secret contains what appears to be the sound of explosions coming from the vicinity of WTC 7 after the collapse of the twin towers, offering yet more startling evidence that the building, which was not hit by a plane yet collapsed demolition style, was deliberately imploded.

The clip was released by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) as part of a 3 terabyte package of video and photo data in response to a lawsuit brought by the International Center for 9/11 Studies. As we highlighted in our previous report, almost every single video studied as part of the release thus far contains damning evidence of controlled demolition on both the twin towers and WTC 7.

The fact that NIST dragged their feet for so long in an attempt to block the release of these highly incriminating videos clearly indicates that they were part of an attempted cover-up. In addition, the fact that some of the videos appear to have been edited in an effort to hide evidence of controlled demolition is another smoking gun.

The latest video is from eyewitness Richard Peskin, who filmed ground zero from a high rise building that appears to be about a dozen blocks down the street from Building 7. The first portion of the footage is filmed immediately after the collapse of the second tower of the World Trade Center. At about 10 seconds into the clip, two clear explosions can be heard.

The clip then cuts to a later time and the cameraman states, “…explosion or something because there’s a lot of police activity and sirens and more smoke rising from the ground – new smoke – so there was some kind of additional explosion but I don’t know what it was….maybe it was a federal building or something like that,” as the camera pans across a shot of WTC 7.

At around 11am – around half an hour after the collapse of the north tower of the World Trade Center and an hour after the collapse of the south tower, Peskin states, “I still hear continuing explosions, I don’t know what it is,” as small explosions can be heard in the background.

At 1:49 in the clip, a louder rumbling explosion can clearly be heard coming from the direction of WTC 7 – “That’s another explosion,” says Peskin.

The clip was contained in the NIST folder named “Richard Peskin” and is a combination of footage from the files PeskinHowever, in subsequent clips released by NIST, where the camera is located nearer to the building, the collapse of the penthouse is clearly edited out of the footage.

“Several clips from the Cumulus database show signs of editing. In the two video clips below, the collapse of the penthouse of World Trade Center 7 is cut out of the video. These videos happen to have been filmed from close to WTC 7, and have a high quality soundtrack that would have picked up explosion sounds from the charges that severed the columns supporting the penthouse, especially the explosion heard in the last video clip presented,” comments the International Center for 9/11 Studies. 25.avi, Peskin 28.avi, Peskin 29.avi, and Peskin 30.avi.

The fact that NIST tried to sit on the footage for months even after a FOIA request and that it took a lawsuit filed by the International Center for 9/11 Studies to obtain the clip clearly indicates that the organization wanted to keep the sound of explosions coming from the vicinity of WTC 7 out of the public record. The footage is filmed from a significant distance away from the scene and shows no detail of anything that could be considered sensitive. The only remarkable thing about the video is the fact that it contains the sound of secondary explosions, something NIST has continually denied was a contributory factor to the collapse of either the twin towers or WTC 7.

In another clip released as part of the same lawsuit, a loud, low-frequency boom can be heard just before the east penthouse of WTC 7 falls. Once the support columns that held up the penthouse are taken out, the rest of the building falls almost within its own footprint.

In another clip, the entire collapse of the building is edited out, the audio is removed and only restored after the building has fully collapsed.

Why is NIST trying to deliberately cover-up evidence of explosions preceding the collapse of WTC 7?

The 9/11 Commission completely ignored the hundreds of survivors, professionals, first responders, firefighters and police who reported numerous secondary explosions at all levels of the twin towers and WTC 7.

NIST’s final report on WTC 7 concluded that the never before observed “new phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” was to blame for the destruction of the building, a completely ludicrous conclusion in a report that completely ignored eyewitness testimony and hard evidence that indicated deliberate demolition of the structure.

As we documented for several years, the collapse of WTC 7 is the smoking gun confirming that the official story behind 9/11 is bogus. The collapse of Building 7 was reported before it happened by several news stations, including BBC and CNN.

If the collapse of WTC 7 came as a result of a “new phenomenon” and an “extraordinary event” that had never happened before in the history of building collapses, then why did news stations and ground zero workers know it was about to happen an hour or more in advance?

Explosions in Building 7 were also reported by eyewitnesses inside the building, including Barry Jennings, who described a “big explosion” that blew him back to the 8th floor.

Former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer was in the immediate vicinity of Building 7 before its collapse at approximately 5:20pm.

“I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn’t see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though,” said Bartmer. “Yeah there was definitely fire in the building, but I didn’t hear any… I didn’t hear any creaking, or… I didn’t hear any indication that it was going to come down. And all of a sudden the radios exploded and everyone started screaming ‘get away, get away, get away from it!’… It was at that moment… I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself… Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the shit’s hitting the ground behind me, and the whole time you’re hearing “boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.” I think I know an explosion when I hear it… Yeah it had some damage to it, but nothing like what they’re saying… Nothing to account for what we saw… I am shocked at the story we’ve heard about it to be quite honest.”

Other EMTs and first responders were also told that Building 7 was to be deliberately demolished, including Emergency Medical Technician Indira Singh - another whistleblower.

“After midday on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down. If you had been there, not being able to see very much just flames everywhere and smoke – it is entirely possible – I do believe that they brought Building 7 down because I heard that they were going to bring it down because it was unstable because of the collateral damage,” said Singh.

Asked who told her that the building was to be “brought down,” Singh responded, “The fire department. And they did use the words ‘we’re gonna have to bring it down’ and for us there observing the nature of the devastation it made total sense to us that this was indeed a possibility, given the subsequent controversy over it I don’t know.”

Another EMT named Mike who wished to remain anonymous wrote in a letter to the Loose Change film crew that emergency responders were told Building 7 was about to be “pulled” and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.

“There were bright flashes up and down the sides of Building 7, you could see them through the windows…and it collapsed. We all knew it was intentionally pulled… they told us,” he stated.

Following news reports in the days after the attack that Building 7 had collapsed due to fire damage, Mike fully expected this mistake to be corrected after the chaos had subsided, but was astonished when it became part of the official story.

Mike’s report of a countdown preceding the collapse of WTC 7 was backed up by Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue, Kevin McPadden, who said that he heard the last few seconds of the countdown on a nearby police radio.

In addition, the language used by firefighters and others at ground zero shortly before the building fell strongly indicates that the building was deliberately demolished with explosives, and not that it fell unaided.

“It’s blowin’ boy.” … “Keep your eye on that building, it’ll be coming down soon.” … “The building is about to blow up, move it back.” … “Here we are walking back. There’s a building, about to blow up…”

The fact that WTC complex leaseholder Larry Silverstein was considering blowing up Building 7 is now admitted. Washington D.C. prosecutor Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, who was at ground zero on 9/11 working as a journalist, reported earlier this year that Silverstein was on the phone to his insurance carrier attempting to convince them that the building should be brought down via controlled demolition.

Writing for Fox News, Jeffrey Scott Shapiro states, “I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard.”

“Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.”

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties’ estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building’s collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on the contention that it was an unforeseen accidental event.

“A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy,” writes Shapiro.

However, obviously aware of how it would impact his insurance claim, Larry Silverstein has consistently denied that there was ever a plan to intentionally demolish Building 7.

In June 2005, Silverstein told New York Post journalist Sam Smith that his infamous “pull it” comment, which has been cited as proof that Silverstein planned to take down the building with explosives, “meant something else”.

In January 2006, Silverstein’s spokesperson Dara McQuillan told the U.S. State Departmentthat the “pull it” comment meant to withdraw firefighters from the building (despite the fact that there were no firefighters inside WTC 7). There was no mention whatsoever of any plan to demolish the building before it fell.

Shapiro’s faux pas unwittingly let the cat out of the bag on the fact that Silverstein was aggressively pushing for the building to be intentionally demolished, a claim that he has always vociferously denied, presumably to safeguard against putting in doubt the massive insurance payout he received on the basis that the collapse was accidental.

How much more evidence do we need to conclude that Building 7 – which was not hit by a plane and suffered limited fires across just a handful of floors – could not have simply crumbled into its own footprint within seven seconds without the aid of additional explosives?

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Of course, if authorities were ever forced to admit that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished it would then tarnish the credibility of the entire 9/11 official story, which is why NIST has engaged in an obvious cover-up to firstly withhold and then edit some of the footage in an attempt to hide the self-evident fact that Building 7 was a controlled demolition.

—

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show.

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Live Superfoods It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the "Global Political Awakening"!

Print this page