Home
Contact Us
Donate
Support Us
Store
Books
Videos
Global Political Awakening and the New World Order
Quotes
Translate
GPA Store: Featured Products
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Senators Unconcerned About Massive Consequences Of Criminalizing Embedding YouTube Videos
Image Source
Mike Masnick
TechDirt
This is really no surprise, but the same Senate Judiciary Committee that
unanimously approved
the PROTECT IP Act, despite worries from
internet experts
and
major media
about how it would break the internet, has now
also unanimously approved the anti-internet streaming bill
that makes it a felony to stream certain videos online -- potentially putting people in jail for embedding YouTube videos or just
putting up YouTube lip synching videos
.
What's really troubling here is that the media and plenty of concerned citizens have directly raised the issues about the unintended consequences of this law. And while Senators Amy Klobuchar, John Cornyn and Christopher Coons continue to insist that (of course) the law is not intended to be used against such people, they have made no move to fix the bill. Even supporters of this bill, who insisted that we were wrong about what the bill allowed, eventually
conceded
that our argument was accurate and that this bill could be used to put people in jail for embedding a YouTube video or doing a lip synch video.
And that's a huge, huge problem. Of course, no one
thinks
the bill is for that purpose directly or that it's going to be widely used for such purposes. However, the bill, as written, clearly allows law enforcement to charge people with a felony for that, assuming it meets a few other conditions. But those conditions are pretty minimal (ads on your page? you're in trouble...). The risk here of abuse is a serious risk, and it's incredibly troubling that Klobuchar, Cornyn and Coons failed to change or adapt the bill, and worse that the rest of the Senate Judiciary Committee allowed the bill to move forward in such a broken state. They were clearly made aware of problems with the bill, but directly chose not to make any changes. How do you explain that other than incompetence or corruption?
Read More at
TechDirt
OPPOSE the PROTECT IP Act HERE
Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:
Delivered by
FeedBurner
0 Comments
Disqus
Fb Comments
[Get It]
Comments :
Newer Post
Older Post
Home