FBI: 9/11 controlled demolition theory is "backed by thorough research and analysis"

Yet there has been no follow-through on their commitment to justice

Dees Illustration

Bob Tuskin

Many people know that Osama Bin Laden was never wanted by the FBI for the crimes of 9/11. In fact, when the FBI was presented with evidence of controlled demolition, it was acknowledged as, “an interesting theory, backed by thorough research and analysis.”

A registered letter was sent to FBI Director Robert Mueller. The letter was written pursuant to Title 18 USC § 2382 “Crimes and Criminal Procedure” or “Misprision of Treason”.

The penalty to a sworn official who violates “Misprision of Treason” by not reporting or acting on the evidence can lead to criminal prosecution, a prison term and a fine. Contained in the letter were references to Richard Gage, AIA and his presentation “9/11: A Blueprint for Truth”.


This presentation gives compelling evidence that CONTROLLED DEMOLITION brought down buildings 1, 2 and 7 that fateful day. The Idea is that USC § 2382 could challenge the FBI to consider the evidence contained in Mr. Gage’s presentation as “actionable intelligence”.  No one could have imagined the FBI’s response to this letter.

The response that was received was not the standard form letter, as may have been expected, but it was instead a direct reply from, Assistant Director of the Counterterrorism Division of the National Security Branch of the FBI, Michael J. Heinbach. 

View FBI Response Here

The materials submitted to the FBI included references to evidence contained in the Richard Gage, AIA presentation entitled: “9/11: BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH”, in which Gage concludes that the CONTROLLED DEMOLITION hypothesis can be proved beyond a reasonable shadow of doubt.

Read Full Article 


Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner